(cc grass5)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 01:13:01AM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:56:25AM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 06:54:37AM +0100, Eric G.Miller via RT wrote:
> > this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=854
> >
> > Wed, Feb 27 2002 06:54:37: Request 854 was acted upon.
> >
> > Transaction: Status changed to resolved by egmiller
> >
> > Queue: grass
> > Area: bug
> > Subject: v.llabel and v.alabel don't write dig_cats file
> > Owner:
> > Requestors: neteler@itc.it
> > Status: resolved
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> thanks for fixing the bug!
> Will you also apply this to the release_branch?What is with this release branch? I thought the purpose of the
merge/sync was to eliminate it as unnecessary duplication.
no - the release branch is alive and kickin' (see Bernhard's mails
for details). The big job done by Glynn was synching both.
You might try the modules out, I'm not sure about the lat/lon
wrap around issue in v.llabel. There was a note about it, but
it doesn't seem likely there'd every be an issue with the coordinates
of a line "wrapping". It might actually introduce an error, but I
don't have any data at the moment to test it against.Re: Syncing. I don't have a tagged branch. I suppose a commit
with the -r flag is sufficient?
You will have to use the '-j' flag. Personally, I have both checked
out and, if files differ only in the update, copy the change across the
direcrtories and submit. If programs start to differ, only -j
is usable (then it starts to get tricky, luckily we didn't reach this
point so far).
Markus