-----Original Message-----
From: Request Tracker [mailto:grass-bugs@intevation.de]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:48 AM
To: grass5@grass.itc.it
Subject: [GRASS5] [bug #1191] (grass) §ïµ½±¼¾v¡A¹w¨¾¨rÀYªº³Ì¨Î¿ï¾Ü
[...]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-82.8 required=5.0
[...]
Is there any known bug that makes "hits" negative?
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:30:49AM +0200, GFernandez-Victorio@igae.minhac.es wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Request Tracker [mailto:grass-bugs@intevation.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:48 AM
> To: grass5@grass.itc.it
> Subject: [GRASS5] [bug #1191] (grass) §ïµ?±??v¡A¹w???rÀYªº³Ì?οï?Ü
[...]
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-82.8 required=5.0
[...]Is there any known bug that makes "hits" negative?
I'll inquire.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:31:26AM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:30:49AM +0200, GFernandez-Victorio@igae.minhac.es wrote:
> > Subject: [GRASS5] [bug #1191] (grass) §ïµ?±??v¡A¹w???rÀYªº³Ì?οï?Ü
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-82.8 required=5.0
> Is there any known bug that makes "hits" negative?
I'll inquire.
It seems that amazon send a lot of mail that trigger
other spam filter tests without being spam a lot of times.
Thus they've been put into the whitelist.
We've finetuned that test in our spamfilter.