On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:34:13AM -0700, David Finlayson wrote:
Ideally, we should run SWIG over the Grass API and build some Python
wrapper classes that encapsulate the C function library.
If you want do to it, I would consider to do it without SWIG.
We've trde swig for a couple of cases and it did not live up to the promiss.
We could call it the PyGRASS API!
Good suggestion, somebody has to make the work.
BTW: It is a question for the development list in detail.
Now, what will my comittee think of this distraction?
Which comittee? 