Should necessary fixes to get GRASS to build with gcc 4.0 be applied to
the 6.0.x branch?
Hamish
On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:44 AM, Hamish wrote:
Should necessary fixes to get GRASS to build with gcc 4.0 be applied to
the 6.0.x branch?
Sorry, I came late to this discussion, but how many are there? I have had little trouble building on OS X Tiger (which uses gcc 4.0).
Kirk
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass5 mailing list
grass5@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5
Sorry Kirk. I wasn't paying attention to this thread either, but now I just tried 6.0.0 (I've been so focused on using the weekly CVS snapshots) on Tiger - I'm getting the same numerical.h error. Are you sure you're looking at the 6.0.0 release? I have no problems with CVS on Tiger.
On Jun 19, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:44 AM, Hamish wrote:
Should necessary fixes to get GRASS to build with gcc 4.0 be applied to
the 6.0.x branch?Sorry, I came late to this discussion, but how many are there? I have had little trouble building on OS X Tiger (which uses gcc 4.0).
Kirk
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass5 mailing list
grass5@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5_______________________________________________
grass5 mailing list
grass5@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5
-----
William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos@kyngchaos.com>
http://www.kyngchaos.com/
"Mon Dieu! but they are all alike. Cheating, murdering, lying, fighting, and all for things that the beasts of the jungle would not deign to possess - money to purchase the effeminate pleasures of weaklings. And yet withal bound down by silly customs that make them slaves to their unhappy lot while firm in the belief that they be the lords of creation enjoying the only real pleasures of existence....
- the wisdom of Tarzan
On Jun 19, 2005, at 11:30 AM, William K wrote:
Sorry Kirk. I wasn't paying attention to this thread either, but now I just tried 6.0.0 (I've been so focused on using the weekly CVS snapshots) on Tiger - I'm getting the same numerical.h error. Are you sure you're looking at the 6.0.0 release? I have no problems with CVS on Tiger.
You're right William. I have been building the 6.1 cvs, not 6.0.0. That would explain it.
On Jun 19, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
On Jun 19, 2005, at 3:44 AM, Hamish wrote:
Should necessary fixes to get GRASS to build with gcc 4.0 be applied to
the 6.0.x branch?Sorry, I came late to this discussion, but how many are there? I have had little trouble building on OS X Tiger (which uses gcc 4.0).
Kirk
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass5 mailing list
grass5@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5_______________________________________________
grass5 mailing list
grass5@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5-----
William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos@kyngchaos.com>
http://www.kyngchaos.com/"Mon Dieu! but they are all alike. Cheating, murdering, lying, fighting, and all for things that the beasts of the jungle would not deign to possess - money to purchase the effeminate pleasures of weaklings. And yet withal bound down by silly customs that make them slaves to their unhappy lot while firm in the belief that they be the lords of creation enjoying the only real pleasures of existence....
- the wisdom of Tarzan
_______________________________________________
grass5 mailing list
grass5@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 20:44 +1200, Hamish wrote:
Should necessary fixes to get GRASS to build with gcc 4.0 be applied to
the 6.0.x branch?
I have been noting them and discussing fixes with authors. Other than
the few changes I have brought up, it should compile cleanly.
I have already fixed lib/image (which still needs further work with
proper casting and endian issues) and am waiting on a module or two I
have noted.
I would like to see these changes made. GCC-4 is less forgiving,
resulting in better code.
--
Brad Douglas <rez@touchofmadness.com>
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 12:21 -0700, Brad Douglas wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 20:44 +1200, Hamish wrote:
> Should necessary fixes to get GRASS to build with gcc 4.0 be applied to
> the 6.0.x branch?I have been noting them and discussing fixes with authors. Other than
the few changes I have brought up, it should compile cleanly.I have already fixed lib/image (which still needs further work with
proper casting and endian issues) and am waiting on a module or two I
have noted.I would like to see these changes made. GCC-4 is less forgiving,
resulting in better code.
I misread the message and assumed CVS, not 6.0. If the next official
release of GRASS is a ways off, then it should probably be done.
--
Brad Douglas <rez@touchofmadness.com>