Hi Huidae, hi all,
I am switching to the developers list for a wider audience...
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:56:38AM +0900, GRASS wrote:
Hi Markus,
[...]
Basically I want to apply FP code to all raster modules. It may be all end users
want, i think. If r.watershed leave untouched, FP map should be converted to
CELL map and it results in losing accuracy, not only wasting time to convert.What about you?
In addition, I would suggest some functionality of raster library.
Now, we should code CELL, FCELL, DCELL maps separately,
e.g., using switch(data_type){ case ....} or if(data_type)...,
I think this make CELL-to-FP converting job difficult.Any smart way to converting?
for all: I have found that r.watershed supports CELL only. It seems
to be a big task to update it to FP due to the code structure.
Does anyone see a chance tp modify the raster library for easier code
management (see Huidae's comment above). Maybe we could define some
wrapper functions which are doing all these "switch" jobs without breaking
existing (and already converted) modules?
Kind regards
Markus
----------------------------------------
If you want to unsubscribe from GRASS Development Team mailing list write to:
minordomo@geog.uni-hannover.de with
subject 'unsubscribe grass5'