Hello!
As promised I am sending you an output of the same
area in png and ps version. The used code was:
for the png file generation
GRASS 5.7.cvs:/home > g.region -p
projection: 1 (UTM)
zone: 33
datum: ** unknown (default: WGS84) **
ellipsoid: bessel
north: 5076605.67605965
south: 5075409.803737
west: 442154.46831029
east: 443407.60021429
nsres: 2.11658818
ewres: 2.11677686
rows: 565
cols: 592
GRASS 5.7.cvs:/home > export GRASS_WIDTH=592
GRASS 5.7.cvs:/home > export GRASS_HEIGHT=565
GRASS 5.7.cvs:/home > export
GRASS_PNGFILE=PlaninskoPolje.png
GRASS 5.7.cvs:/home > d.mon start=PNG
PNG: GRASS_TRUECOLOR status: TRUE
PNG: collecting to file: PlaninskoPolje.png,
GRASS_WIDTH=592, GRASS_HEIGHT=565
Graphics driver [PNG] started
GRASS 5.7.cvs:/home > d.rast PlaninskoPolje
100%
GRASS 5.7.cvs:/home > d.mon stop=PNG
Monitor 'PNG' terminated
and for the ps file generation simply
raster PlaninskoPolje
end
Please try comparing the two files and possibly print
them too and see for yourself. The postscript file is
displayes and printed with less resolution.
Thanks for your help, Miha Staut
___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
(attachments)
PlaninskoPolje.tar.bz2 (91 KB)