ThanQ Dylan,
the webpage is very interesting. We eagerly await
further inputs from U.
Cartographic elegance is one thing that should not
burden nations with investing in software like Autocad
etc. The wonderful work of GRASS must be suitably
supported by another FOSS such taht this hurdle is
also solved. GMT is doing it to a alarge extent (or in
complete ?).
Ravi
--- Dylan Beaudette <dylan@iici.no-ip.org> wrote:
On May 28, 2005, at 5:05 AM, RAVI KUMAR wrote:
> Dear All,
> GMT was the suggested program for Cartography and
map hardcopy outputs.
> 1. Please suggest if there are any workedout
exercises.
> 2. Is there any other FOSS software recommended
for work similar to
> Autocad or Microstation.
>
> ThanQ
> Ravi
>Ravi,
While GMT can produce quality output maps from GRASS
data, the GMT
syntax can be a little daunting at first.
Furthermore, the GMT man
pages can sometimes be a bit terse.I am working on documenting some examples of a GRASS
- GMT workflow
here:
http://169.237.35.250/~dylan/grass_user_group/map1.html
Hope this helps,
--
Dylan Beaudette
Soils and Biogeochemistry Graduate Group
University of California at Davis
530.754.7341
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/