khoros junkmail

>Precedence: Bulk
>To: grassu-list@amber.cecer.army.mil
>Subject: khoros junkmail
>Status: R
>
>I wish to go on record as protesting the posting of the entire khoros
>FAQ list on the grassusers list. A simple address to the location of
>the khoros internet node containing the FAQs would have been sufficient.
>
>Anyone else out there resent this?
>
>Liz

I'll second this protest. In fact, I don't think any entry to a general mail
list should be NOT more than 50 to 70 lines, period.

While I'm at it, I'll also flame those who have rediculous signatures.

But I don't know what we can do about it other than an occasional
reminder of their sins.

Maybe we can get CERL to fix the re-mailer so it will only spit back
the first 50 lines.

Gerald (Jerry) I. Evenden Internet: gie@charon.er.usgs.gov
voice: (508)563-6766 Postal: P.O. Box 1027
  fax: (508)457-2310 N.Falmouth, MA 02556-1027

Friends,

While I agree that it is occasionally inconvenient to receive large postings of
a speculative value, I don't think that an arbitrary line limit of 50 to 70
would necessarily serve us well. However, it might be very useful to some users
to have a limit which they could set via a list server command and which would
apply only to their own mail receipts.

Would creation of such a new list server command be a possibility?

Personally, I don't see a problem with the use of signature files of a modest
size. And I certainly enjoy some that I see! And while some signatures may
appear 'rediculous', the recipient can always dispose of them along with the
messages to which they are appended.

Thank You,

| _______ __ __ Joseph K. Vaughan |
| / | / Institute of Atmospheric Physics |
| / ___ __ | / University of Arizona |
| \ / / / /__\ | / PAS Bldg, Rm 464 |
| --- /__/ \__ |/ o Tucson, AZ 85721 |
| jkv@air.atmo.arizona.edu 602/621-9663 |