#3104: geoserver-users SF mailman to discourse?
----------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: jive | Owner: sac-tickets@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2024-II
Component: SysAdmin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
----------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by robe):
Replying to [comment:18 cvvergara]:
> The "user" category will be created on the root when importing
> - Once its created to avoid mishaps
> - security: `everyone` can: See (no Reply no create)
For clarification, assume you mean:
The "geoserver-user" category will be created on the root when importing
> Move "user" under geoserver category
Move "geoserver-user" category under geoserver category and rename to
"user"
> About the 3 levels, its new! I could not do it the last time I tried.
We have some already
You'll see that SAC and OSGeoLive categories are now 3 levels down:
[[Image(3-levels.png)]]
> PS. Personally I like to see pgRouting on the root
Yah I do too, and if I can ever convince PostGIS and GEOS PSC to move, I'd
want to see them on the root too.
I also think that if QGIS moves down one level to projects it's going to
crowd out the other projects, cause QGIS has developer, users, various
language specific categories, various extension specific categories. Heck
they might even want 3 levels from QGIS (which would make it 4 levels,
too hard to manage).
Which means to be fair to the other projects, if QGIS is at the top other
projects need to be allowed to be at the top too.
But I think having 3 levels down for our internal committees like SAC,
Board, Marketing makes great sense.
--
Ticket URL: <#3104 (geoserver-users SF mailman to discourse?) – OSGeo;
OSGeo <Gter - OSGeo;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.