----- Begin Included Message -----
>From grass-lists-owner@max.cecer.army.mil Wed Oct 13 10:59:53 1993
Return-Path: <grass-lists-owner@max.cecer.army.mil>
From: svdhara@npac.syr.edu (Sastry V. Dhara)
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Parallel GRASS
Content-Length: 550
X-Lines: 29We are trying to rewirite parts of GRASS code to be run
on Parallel Machines.We are trying to identify those functions that are
compuatationally intensive.The functions we identified so far are:
r.mapcalc and r.buffer
Can you suggest any other functions that take a lot of
CPU time ?Also, I request those who are already doing this kind of
work to share their experiences here.Or, you can send me mail directly.
Thanks.
Sastry Dhara
Northeast Parallel Architectures Center
Syracuse University
Syracuse, NY 13244
You might add r.los and the surface generation modules to the list.
--
James A. Farley Technical Director, CAST/NCRI-SW
12 Ozark Hall, Univ. of Arkansas
jim@cast.uark.edu Fayetteville, AR 72701
Voice: (501) 575-6159 FAX : (501) 575-3846