-----Mensaje original-----
De: Bernhard Reiter
Enviado el: lunes, 11 de agosto de 2003 12:10
Para: grass5 developers list
Asunto: Re: [GRASS5] Let's publish 5.0.3
[...]
>(yes, 5.4 will be the last stable version of the 5.x line):
> http://grass.itc.it/roadmap.html
According to the document that would be 5.8.x
unless you've meant 5.0.x. 
5.8 is first stable version of the 6.x development line.
The numbering could be strange, but the document seems rather
clear. Hence the jump from 5.4 to 5.8.
Actually I'm against planing for 6.x as 5.10 will follow
5.9.x releases.
Radim's changes seems to be enough radical to mean a major
version swift, but maybe I'm wrong.
Regards
Gonzalo
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:41:42PM +0200, "Fernández-Victorio Arévalo, Gonzalo" wrote:
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Bernhard Reiter
> Enviado el: lunes, 11 de agosto de 2003 12:10
> Para: grass5 developers list
> Asunto: Re: [GRASS5] Let's publish 5.0.3
>
[...]
> >(yes, 5.4 will be the last stable version of the 5.x line):
> > http://grass.itc.it/roadmap.html
>
> According to the document that would be 5.8.x
> unless you've meant 5.0.x.
5.8 is first stable version of the 6.x development line.
The numbering could be strange, but the document seems rather
clear. Hence the jump from 5.4 to 5.8.
Actually 5.8 is what was planned as 5.1.x and 5.2.x stable
releases so that is the 6.x development line this is confused.
> Actually I'm against planing for 6.x as 5.10 will follow
> 5.9.x releases.
Let's say: "Might".
Radim's changes seems to be enough radical to mean a major
version swift, but maybe I'm wrong.
No doubt that his improvements are major.
This is only about a clear numbering issue.