representing geology with rasters?

Hi Grasshoppers

thanks to everyone who replied to my question about boreholes a few
weeks ago.

I am trying to link GRASS to a ground-water flow model. At the
moment am a considering the problem of representing geology within
the GRASS database. The model I am using divides the geology up into
3d cells with constant properties (eg hydraulic conductivity) within a
cell. Rasters are two dimensional, so the only two ways I can see of
representing geology are as a series of planar slices through the
geology, or as a series of "DEMS" following strategraphic surfaces.
Either way I can see a lot of problems looming, particularly with
maintaining consistency between raster layers as GRASS has no way
(that I know) of linking rasters except by giving them sensible
names; eg layer_1 layer_2 etc

At the moment I favour using strategraphic surfaces as this fits the
model I am using most closely, and GRASS is quite rich with surface
interpolation routines. I am concern however that when I
change region, resampling will lead to layers intersecting, a kind of
3d analogy to the problem of slivers in vector data.
my head hurts :frowning:

Has anyone addressed this problem before?

You can probably tell I'm no geologist or database engineer, comments,
discussion and references welcome :slight_smile:

much cheer Tom.

Tom Charnock
Dept Civil Engineering
Aston University
Birmingham B7 5NJ UK
charnotw@aston.ac.uk