Newsgroups: info.grass.user
Path: ront
From: ront@picea.CFNR.ColoState.EDU (Ronald Thomas)
Subject: Re: GRASS and ARC....
Sender: news@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU (News Account)
Message-ID: <Cqtv77.LE1@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 1994 15:33:07 GMT
References: <9406020011.AA34960@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <199406031359.IAA18219@spock.uark.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: niwot.cnr.colostate.edu
Organization: College of Natural Resources, Colo. State Univ.
Lines: 21
In article <199406031359.IAA18219@spock.uark.edu> grassu-list@max.cecer.army.mil writes:
I just had to put my two "sense" worth into this thread:
I would suppose (my guess, not first-hand knowledge, by any means) that
the DATABASE integration sold ARC to the USFS, (unless they got a good price,-----
There is a very solid DATABASE linkage in GRASS with the db tools.
DB tools works with Informix, Oracle and Ingress at last count and
--
W. Fredrick Limp
True, these tools exist, but were developed AFTER the local USFS offices
decided on ARC. And I still have not seen a definitive, in-depth, objective
review of any of the db tools, other than their developers' commenting on how
good they are. Please inform us if there is one that has been overlooked.
Ronald Thomas ront@meeker.cfnr.colostate.edu
Natural Resource Spec. (GIS) ^^^ Phone: 303-586-1285
Resources Management Division ^^ ^^^^^ FAX: 303-586-1310
Rocky Mountain National Park ^^^ ^^^^^^^ Estes Park, CO 80517