Based on this (following) communication am I to believe that all the effort I have put into this process so far will lead me back to the drawing board when I try to implement 6.2 on a windows system running cygwin?
----- Original Message ----
From: Moritz Lennert mlennert@club.worldonline.be
To: Hamish hamish_nospam@yahoo.com
Cc: grassuser@grass.itc.it; Glynn Clements glynn@gclements.plus.com; wingrass@grass.itc.it
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2007 5:57:55 AM
Subject: Re: [winGRASS] Re: [GRASS-user] Re: Xganim errors in WinGRASS
On 07/02/07 00:25, Hamish wrote:
(general call for packagers)
It would sure be nice if someone produced a GRASS 6.2.1 Cygwin binary.
Currently the most up-to-date binary available for the Cygwin version
is 6.1-cvs April 17, 2006. i.e. there is still no stable GRASS 6.2
available for Windows users – what’s the problem? shared libs?
I think this is mainly due to the fact that we are not very far from a
real native windows version. I think dev efforts should rather be put
into that.
Moritz
grassuser mailing list
grassuser@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser
Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started!