Glynn,
I am currently actively using winGRASS for my work because I could not afford the ridiculously expensive suit like the ArcGIS Desktop. I have tried ArcGIS demo and with GRASS and winGRASS current ability has already surpassed ArcGIS Desktop in some areas. I would also like to find out 'How To' and 'How Easy' we can extend winGRASS, in terms of adding functionalities, whether it is the interface/menu functions, or algorithms used to solve let say, network analysis problem.
1. use the native version on a day-to-day basis, in spite of its
current "alpha" quality, and
2. take responsibility for getting any issues resolved.Point #2 doesn't necessarily mean that they need to fix any and all
bugs themselves, but they will need to provide meaningful bug reports,
apply and test any proposed fixes, etc.
I am more than happy to be part of the group to continuously providing bugs but as for testing fixes I am afraid with my humble (none!) knowledge on C and linux and software building and compiling, I could not help much. Having said that, I would be happy to help if members are willing to provide explanation on the detail steps involves in testing fixes in window terms, i.e. they do not really need to explain everything on the fixes / codes, just the steps on what/where/how to compile and test.
Thanks
Best Regards
Casey
From: Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
To: Moritz Lennert <mlennert@club.worldonline.be>
CC: grassuser@grass.itc.it, Hamish <hamish_nospam@yahoo.com>, wingrass@grass.itc.it
Subject: Re: [winGRASS] Re: [GRASS-user] Re: Xganim errors in WinGRASS
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:37:57 +0000Moritz Lennert wrote:
> > (general call for packagers)
> > It would sure be nice if someone produced a GRASS 6.2.1 Cygwin binary.
> > Currently the most up-to-date binary available for the Cygwin version
> > is 6.1-cvs April 17, 2006. i.e. there is still no stable GRASS 6.2
> > available for Windows users -- what's the problem? shared libs?
>
> I think this is mainly due to the fact that we are not very far from a
> real native windows version. I think dev efforts should rather be put
> into that.Actually, I'd say that we're still quite a long way from having a
*usable* native Windows version.Most of the people who have contributed to the native version don't
normally use Windows[1]. Thus, they aren't likely to be as motivated
to solve issues as would someone who actually has a *need* for a
native Windows version.[1] At least, not for GRASS; I use it for playing games, watching
videos, and running an X server so that I can do "work" on my Linux
box without needing a second monitor/keyboard.A *usable* native Windows version is going to require one or more
people who are willing to:1. use the native version on a day-to-day basis, in spite of its
current "alpha" quality, and
2. take responsibility for getting any issues resolved.Point #2 doesn't necessarily mean that they need to fix any and all
bugs themselves, but they will need to provide meaningful bug reports,
apply and test any proposed fixes, etc.Oh, we also need either a version of v.digit which doesn't require an
interactive monitor (XDRIVER), or a port of the driver code (and the
corresponding part of libraster) to Windows. Regarding the latter,
it's the startup code from lib/driver/main.c which is the main issue;
the X-specific stuff is already adequately handled by libW11.--
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>_______________________________________________
winGRASS mailing list
winGRASS@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/wingrass
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Hotmail is evolving – check out the new Windows Live Mail http://ideas.live.com