I would like to put up a motion for vote that proposes that the documentation written for GeoNetwork opensource will be released under a less restrictive license than the one we use at present.
Alle 17:04:50 di venerdì 26 novembre 2010, Jeroen Ticheler ha scritto:
Dear Project Steering Committee members,
I would like to put up a motion for vote that proposes that the
documentation written for GeoNetwork opensource will be released under a
less restrictive license than the one we use at present.
I would like to put up a motion for vote that proposes that the documentation written for GeoNetwork opensource will be released under a less restrictive license than the one we use at present.
Could you please cast your votes or come back to the list with points for discussion?
+1
Do we have a list of contributors to the documentation ? probably most of them are in the PSC, but maybe not and they should be aware of a license change ?
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
Hi Francois,
We don’t have a list of contributors as far as I know. The quick start guide that forms part of the User documentation was written mostly by Patrizia in collaboration with someone hired at the time by OCHA. I’ve been doing some editing work on that. The other documentation has indeed been written by those who are on the PSC or are active committers to the project. We can try to make a list of contributors in case we foresee problems there. Personally I don’t think there are such issues, but that’s just me.
Ciao,
Jeroen
On 28 nov 2010, at 17:22, Francois Prunayre wrote:
I would like to put up a motion for vote that proposes that the documentation written for GeoNetwork opensource will be released under a less restrictive license than the one we use at present.
Could you please cast your votes or come back to the list with points for discussion?
+1
Do we have a list of contributors to the documentation ? probably most of them are in the PSC, but maybe not and they should be aware of a license change ?
<GeoCat_small.png>Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
If this makes contribs to the doco easier then it's good.
Cheers,
Simon
________________________________________
From: Jeroen Ticheler [jeroen.ticheler@anonymised.com]
Sent: Saturday, 27 November 2010 3:04 AM
To: GeoNetwork list
Subject: [GeoNetwork-devel] Motion: Change of documentation license
Dear Project Steering Committee members,
I would like to put up a motion for vote that proposes that the documentation written for GeoNetwork opensource will be released under a less restrictive license than the one we use at present.
I would like to put up a motion for vote that proposes that the documentation written for GeoNetwork opensource will be released under a less restrictive license than the one we use at present.
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com [mailto:Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com]
Sent: 29 November 2010 01:12
To: jeroen.ticheler@anonymised.com; geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] Motion: Change of documentation license
+1
If this makes contribs to the doco easier then it's good.
Cheers,
Simon
________________________________________
From: Jeroen Ticheler [jeroen.ticheler@anonymised.com]
Sent: Saturday, 27 November 2010 3:04 AM
To: GeoNetwork list
Subject: [GeoNetwork-devel] Motion: Change of documentation license
Dear Project Steering Committee members,
I would like to put up a motion for vote that proposes that the documentation written for GeoNetwork opensource will be released under a less restrictive license than the one we use at present.
Could you please cast your votes or come back to the list with points for discussion?
Thanks and have a nice weekend,
Jeroen
____________________________________________________
GeoCat
introduces Bridge(c)
An extension to ArcGIS(c) to instantly publish data and metadata on GeoServer and GeoNetwork. See http://geocat.net/> for more details. Buy Bridge Standard before 30 November 2010 and get a free upgrade to our Premium edition.
[cid:B0949C11-3920-4536-B5D5-DD637E5C6532]Please consider the environment before printing this email.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.