Hi,
What are the plans for 3.4.0? I know Jose is working on a 3.2.2 and we
discussed in Bolsena about moving to 3.4-stable and 3.6-develop.
I'm asking because of
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/2143#issuecomment-326976965
and many other PR I have queued to have the draft feature on the
editor. If there are no immediate plans for 3.4 I would propose to
start accepting my PR or it will deviate again too much.
So, who is interested in 3.4?
Regards,
María.
Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production, geocat.ch should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability (we recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to release the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.
For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will lead to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it in develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:41 AM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
What are the plans for 3.4.0? I know Jose is working on a 3.2.2 and we
discussed in Bolsena about moving to 3.4-stable and 3.6-develop.I’m asking because of
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/2143#issuecomment-326976965
and many other PR I have queued to have the draft feature on the
editor. If there are no immediate plans for 3.4 I would propose to
start accepting my PR or it will deviate again too much.So, who is interested in 3.4?
Regards,
María.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@…537…sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
camptocamp
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
Florent Gravin
0479444492
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production, geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability (we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?
I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.
As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that's what PRs
are for, to make sure 
If you are afraid of this changes bringing
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested before November ?
It is probably safer to
Francois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production, geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability (we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@…537…sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we're working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
* make 3.4.x branch now
* plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
* include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
> geocat.ch
> should be on November and Ifremer on October.
> We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
> (we
> recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
> release
> the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.
>
> For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
> lead
> to a stable version, kind of alpha.
> Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
> in
> develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that's what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com189…> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comsourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@…537…sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Hi,
Is it fine if I create branch 3.4.x and you continue working on it?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
+1
2017-09-11 12:28 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com…>:
Hi,
Is it fine if I create branch 3.4.x and you continue working on it?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Created: https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/tree/3.4.x
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com.> wrote:
+1
2017-09-11 12:28 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Hi,
Is it fine if I create branch 3.4.x and you continue working on it?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com…> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Dear all, there was some discussions on 3.4.0 release here and there.
I would propose to make it next week as there was lots of testing on ifremer, geocat.ch, ngr, eea, iow, metawal, … in the last 2 months.
Please raise any PR or issues which should be merged/fixed before that ? currently 3 PR
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A3.4.0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A3.4.0
If not solved on 3.4.0, we will move them to 3.4.1 milestone.
I could take care of making the release on Wednesday or Thursday.
Does it sounds good to you ?
Francois
2017-09-11 12:43 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Created: https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/tree/3.4.x
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
+1
2017-09-11 12:28 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Hi,
Is it fine if I create branch 3.4.x and you continue working on it?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Anyone ?
2017-11-28 20:29 GMT+01:00 Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>:
Dear all, there was some discussions on 3.4.0 release here and there.
I would propose to make it next week as there was lots of testing on ifremer, geocat.ch, ngr, eea, iow, metawal, … in the last 2 months.
Please raise any PR or issues which should be merged/fixed before that ? currently 3 PR
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A3.4.0https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A3.4.0
If not solved on 3.4.0, we will move them to 3.4.1 milestone.
I could take care of making the release on Wednesday or Thursday.
Does it sounds good to you ?
Francois
2017-09-11 12:43 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Created: https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/tree/3.4.x
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com…31…> wrote:
+1
2017-09-11 12:28 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Hi,
Is it fine if I create branch 3.4.x and you continue working on it?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com…> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Hi Francois
Sounds fine. I have pending some PR for INSPIRE, will try to do them today, but not sure if will have time. In that case, maybe can be moved to 3.4.1 I guess.
Regards,
Jose García
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Anyone ?
–
2017-11-28 20:29 GMT+01:00 Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>:
Dear all, there was some discussions on 3.4.0 release here and there.
I would propose to make it next week as there was lots of testing on ifremer, geocat.ch, ngr, eea, iow, metawal, … in the last 2 months.
Please raise any PR or issues which should be merged/fixed before that ? currently 3 PR
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A3.4.0https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A3.4.0
If not solved on 3.4.0, we will move them to 3.4.1 milestone.
I could take care of making the release on Wednesday or Thursday.
Does it sounds good to you ?
Francois
2017-09-11 12:43 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Created: https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/tree/3.4.x
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
+1
2017-09-11 12:28 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Hi,
Is it fine if I create branch 3.4.x and you continue working on it?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Hi Jose, thanks for the feedback. I would say we should keep that INSPIRE PR to 3.4.1 as we also have pending work related to this (eg. validation).
Cheers
Francois
2017-12-05 8:25 GMT+01:00 Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com>:
Hi Francois
Sounds fine. I have pending some PR for INSPIRE, will try to do them today, but not sure if will have time. In that case, maybe can be moved to 3.4.1 I guess.
Regards,
Jose García
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Anyone ?
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
2017-11-28 20:29 GMT+01:00 Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>:
Dear all, there was some discussions on 3.4.0 release here and there.
I would propose to make it next week as there was lots of testing on ifremer, geocat.ch, ngr, eea, iow, metawal, … in the last 2 months.
Please raise any PR or issues which should be merged/fixed before that ? currently 3 PR
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A3.4.0https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A3.4.0
If not solved on 3.4.0, we will move them to 3.4.1 milestone.
I could take care of making the release on Wednesday or Thursday.
Does it sounds good to you ?
Francois
2017-09-11 12:43 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Created: https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/tree/3.4.x
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
+1
2017-09-11 12:28 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Hi,
Is it fine if I create branch 3.4.x and you continue working on it?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
FYI, I’ll make the release this afternoon.
Transifex is also up to date, so if you’ve time to translate latest changes, check on transifex https://www.transifex.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/
Francois
2017-12-05 8:50 GMT+01:00 Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>:
Hi Jose, thanks for the feedback. I would say we should keep that INSPIRE PR to 3.4.1 as we also have pending work related to this (eg. validation).
Cheers
Francois
2017-12-05 8:25 GMT+01:00 Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com>:
Hi Francois
Sounds fine. I have pending some PR for INSPIRE, will try to do them today, but not sure if will have time. In that case, maybe can be moved to 3.4.1 I guess.
Regards,
Jose García
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Anyone ?
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
2017-11-28 20:29 GMT+01:00 Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>:
Dear all, there was some discussions on 3.4.0 release here and there.
I would propose to make it next week as there was lots of testing on ifremer, geocat.ch, ngr, eea, iow, metawal, … in the last 2 months.
Please raise any PR or issues which should be merged/fixed before that ? currently 3 PR
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A3.4.0https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A3.4.0
If not solved on 3.4.0, we will move them to 3.4.1 milestone.
I could take care of making the release on Wednesday or Thursday.
Does it sounds good to you ?
Francois
2017-09-11 12:43 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@…31…>:
Created: https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/tree/3.4.x
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
+1
2017-09-11 12:28 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
Hi,
Is it fine if I create branch 3.4.x and you continue working on it?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Francois
I agree with your plan, lets proceed like that please.
Regards,
Jose García
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:29 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
Fine for me. The following PRs are harder. So just create 3.4.0 with
whatever you want and let me know when I can merge my PR to develop.On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi, the refactoring of DataManager sounds good and the draft copy PR has
been around for quite some times.
As Florent said, having a 3.4.0 release end of October/November match a
number of projects planning we’re working on.
If we merge this PRs on develop and make 3.4 after, it will require some
merge work on probably all projects, and it would require to finalize the
draft work before 3.4. Not sure it is feasible to have it ready and tested
before November ?It is probably safer to
- make 3.4.x branch now
- plan the 3.4.0 in 2 months
- include the draft workspace in develop and once done, we can decide to
make new releaseFrancois
2017-09-05 11:53 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Florent Gravin
<florent.gravin@anonymised.com> wrote:Hi,
We are working on develop to release 2 big catalogs on production,
geocat.ch
should be on November and Ifremer on October.
We thought that releasing thoses catalogs would assure good stability
(we
recently fixed huge amounts of bugs in the editor) and allow us to
release
the GN 3.4.0. So quite soon I would say.For now, we could do a 3.4.x branch with the state of develop that will
lead
to a stable version, kind of alpha.
Do you want your stuff in next release ? Is it stable enough to put it
in
develop if we have for example a release in the next 2 months ?I have a long list of PR pending that are concatenated. Waiting 2
months is not a good approach, new things will come that will force me
to do a lot of re-merging.As far as I know, my PRs will not break anything, but that’s what PRs
are for, to make sure
unstability then maybe we should already create 3.4.x and start
merging my PRs in develop.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@anonymised.comorge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
–
Vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Jose García
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)318 416664
Please consider the environment before printing this email.