I modified the Geotools homepage so it proudly announces 2.2.x as the
stable branch.
I also added two wiki pages - [2.2.x] and [2.3.x].
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.2.x
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.3.x
2.2.x has some info about 2.2.x and what the plan for it is. Its a wiki
so you can modify what I said. There's a few sections that need
filling in. Add more sections if you want.
2.3.x is just a placeholder, but I hope someone will fill in the
expected development, etc... for it.
Unfortunately, 2.2.x isnt currently building on my machine (others are
having problems too). When it does, I'll branch geoserver trunk and
move it to 2.2.x. I'll fill in the "transitioning from 2.1.x to 2.2.x"
section on the wiki as I do this.
I'm planning on setting up a geoserver site near the end of next week,
so I'll do some testing then. Brent will hopefully be back from
holidays around then, and I'll get him to do some more testing. We'll
make a 1.3.0a-Experimental for others to test on. If everything goes
well we'll move trunk to 2.2. The first "offical" 2.2 based release
will be 1.3.1.
NOTE: 1.3.1 will probably be scaled back from whats currently in JIRA,
but there are already a bunch of good fixes from 1.3.0.
dave
----------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: https://webmail.limegroup.com/
dblasby@anonymised.com wrote:
I modified the Geotools homepage so it proudly announces 2.2.x as the
stable branch.
Um, then we should mark the next release as 2.2.0? I like my version numbers to indicate truth 
Lets wait for your geoserver tests
to chime in (you have more extensive tests then uDig does) and kick it on out.
I also added two wiki pages - [2.2.x] and [2.3.x].
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.2.x
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.3.x
Okay,
we should link to these from the RnD page (aka these 2.2.x is development and 2.3.x is Research).
2.2.x has some info about 2.2.x and what the plan for it is. Its a wiki
so you can modify what I said. There's a few sections that need
filling in. Add more sections if you want.
2.3.x is just a placeholder, but I hope someone will fill in the
expected development, etc... for it.
I am kinda stuck on confluence access right now, so I concentrated on asking the very good questions that were raised on the user list.
If *anyone* can cut and paste this into the wiki as a temporary measure we will be ahead on this one.
Unfortunately, 2.2.x isnt currently building on my machine (others are
having problems too). When it does, I'll branch geoserver trunk and
move it to 2.2.x. I'll fill in the "transitioning from 2.1.x to 2.2.x"
section on the wiki as I do this.
I built today w/ no problem. I saw your error message and did not make sense of it.
NOTE: 1.3.1 will probably be scaled back from whats currently in JIRA,
but there are already a bunch of good fixes from 1.3.0.
Nifty,
Jody
dblasby@anonymised.com wrote:
I modified the Geotools homepage so it proudly announces 2.2.x as the
stable branch.
I also added two wiki pages - [2.2.x] and [2.3.x].
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.2.x
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.3.x
Updated a bit ... please review.