[Geoserver-devel] cite test status

Justin_Deoliveira · May 20, 2010, 3:38am

So at this point all the cite tests are happy except for wms. The issues are quite clearly the combination of the engine and the tests I am trying to run. They blatantly don't work but after much patching of the tests I was able to get most to pass. However there are still some that outright fail with engine failures... not sure what to do at this point, i have submitted the issue to the cite forum and am awaiting a response.

All that said I don't think this should be a blocker as I think the version of the engine/tests that Victor is running work just fine.

I also am quite sure that these tests have been added recently so were not there the last time we did cite.

Anyways, I will let the powers at be make the call but I would say cite is probably good enough to go for a release.

-Justin

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

VT1 · May 20, 2010, 4:03am

Hi Justin,

My last build have everything passing including the wcs1.0.0 and those
errors that you have concluded with the wfs1.1.0

I did see an new error with running the wfs1.1.0 but it is not consistent.
My observation is that it doesn't fail all the time and sometimes when I
execute the test by itself it passes and other time it fails.

Should we continue with the release? I will do one last update build while
waiting for Ben to give the green light if we do go ahead.

Test wfs:wfs-1.1.0-LockFeature-tc3.1 (View Details): Failed

Request d1e29052_1:
   Method: POST
   URL: http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs
   Body:
<wfs:LockFeature xmlns="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl"
xmlns:ctl="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl"
                 xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
                 xmlns:myparsers="http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers"
                 xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc"
                 xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows"
                 xmlns:p="http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers"
                 xmlns:parsers="http://www.occamlab.com/te/parsers"
                 xmlns:saxon="http://saxon.sf.net/"
                 xmlns:sf="http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf"
                 xmlns:te="http://www.occamlab.com/te"
                 xmlns:tec="java:com.occamlab.te.TECore"
                 xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs"
                 xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
                 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
                 xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
                 xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
                 expiry="5"
                 handle="LockFeature-tc3"
                 lockAction="ALL"
                 service="WFS"
                 version="1.1.0">
   <wfs:Lock handle="lock-1" typeName="sf:EntitéGénérique">
      <ogc:Filter>
         <ogc:BBOX>
            <ogc:PropertyName>sf:attribut.Géométrie</ogc:PropertyName>
            <gml:Envelope srsName="urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326">
               <gml:lowerCorner>34.5 -10.0</gml:lowerCorner>
               <gml:upperCorner>72.0 32.0</gml:upperCorner>
            </gml:Envelope>
         </ogc:BBOX>
      </ogc:Filter>
   </wfs:Lock>
</wfs:LockFeature>
   Response from parser p:XMLValidatingParser.GMLSF1:
      <ows:ExceptionReport xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows"
                     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
                     version="1.0.0"
                     xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/ows
http://localhost:8080/geoserver/schemas/ows/1.0.0/owsExceptionReport.xsd">
  <ows:Exception exceptionCode="NoApplicableCode">
      <ows:ExceptionText>Could not aquire locks
for:net.opengis.wfs.impl.FeaturesNotLockedTypeImpl@anonymised.com (group: null,
featureId: [EntitéGénérique.f004, EntitéGénérique.f007,
EntitéGénérique.f017])</ows:ExceptionText>
  </ows:Exception>
</ows:ExceptionReport>

Message d1e29112_1:
FAILURE: Expected 2 or more sf:EntitéGénérique instances to be locked
(reported 0)

Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote:

So at this point all the cite tests are happy except for wms. The issues
are quite clearly the combination of the engine and the tests I am
trying to run. They blatantly don't work but after much patching of the
tests I was able to get most to pass. However there are still some that
outright fail with engine failures... not sure what to do at this point,
i have submitted the issue to the cite forum and am awaiting a response.

All that said I don't think this should be a blocker as I think the
version of the engine/tests that Victor is running work just fine.

I also am quite sure that these tests have been added recently so were
not there the last time we did cite.

Anyways, I will let the powers at be make the call but I would say cite
is probably good enough to go for a release.

-Justin

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/cite-test-status-tp28616849p28616937.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

VT1 · May 20, 2010, 4:22am

Consulted Ben and we are going go ahead with the release based on the success
hudson has on it cite testing.

VT@anonymised.com wrote:

Hi Justin,

My last build have everything passing including the wcs1.0.0 and those
errors that you have concluded with the wfs1.1.0

I did see an new error with running the wfs1.1.0 but it is not consistent.
My observation is that it doesn't fail all the time and sometimes when I
execute the test by itself it passes and other time it fails.

Should we continue with the release? I will do one last update build while
waiting for Ben to give the green light if we do go ahead.

Test wfs:wfs-1.1.0-LockFeature-tc3.1 (View Details): Failed

Request d1e29052_1:
   Method: POST
   URL: http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs
   Body:
<wfs:LockFeature xmlns="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl"
xmlns:ctl="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl"
                 xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"

xmlns:myparsers="http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers"
                 xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc"
                 xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows"
                 xmlns:p="http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers"
                 xmlns:parsers="http://www.occamlab.com/te/parsers"
                 xmlns:saxon="http://saxon.sf.net/"
                 xmlns:sf="http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf"
                 xmlns:te="http://www.occamlab.com/te"
                 xmlns:tec="java:com.occamlab.te.TECore"
                 xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs"
                 xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
                 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
                 xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
                 xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
                 expiry="5"
                 handle="LockFeature-tc3"
                 lockAction="ALL"
                 service="WFS"
                 version="1.1.0">
   <wfs:Lock handle="lock-1" typeName="sf:EntitéGénérique">
      <ogc:Filter>
         <ogc:BBOX>
            <ogc:PropertyName>sf:attribut.Géométrie</ogc:PropertyName>
            <gml:Envelope srsName="urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326">
               <gml:lowerCorner>34.5 -10.0</gml:lowerCorner>
               <gml:upperCorner>72.0 32.0</gml:upperCorner>
            </gml:Envelope>
         </ogc:BBOX>
      </ogc:Filter>
   </wfs:Lock>
</wfs:LockFeature>
   Response from parser p:XMLValidatingParser.GMLSF1:
      <ows:ExceptionReport xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows"
                     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
                     version="1.0.0"
                     xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/ows
http://localhost:8080/geoserver/schemas/ows/1.0.0/owsExceptionReport.xsd">
  <ows:Exception exceptionCode="NoApplicableCode">
      <ows:ExceptionText>Could not aquire locks
for:net.opengis.wfs.impl.FeaturesNotLockedTypeImpl@anonymised.com (group: null,
featureId: [EntitéGénérique.f004, EntitéGénérique.f007,
EntitéGénérique.f017])</ows:ExceptionText>
  </ows:Exception>
</ows:ExceptionReport>

Message d1e29112_1:
   FAILURE: Expected 2 or more sf:EntitéGénérique instances to be locked
(reported 0)

Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote:

So at this point all the cite tests are happy except for wms. The issues
are quite clearly the combination of the engine and the tests I am
trying to run. They blatantly don't work but after much patching of the
tests I was able to get most to pass. However there are still some that
outright fail with engine failures... not sure what to do at this point,
i have submitted the issue to the cite forum and am awaiting a response.

All that said I don't think this should be a blocker as I think the
version of the engine/tests that Victor is running work just fine.

I also am quite sure that these tests have been added recently so were
not there the last time we did cite.

Anyways, I will let the powers at be make the call but I would say cite
is probably good enough to go for a release.

-Justin

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/cite-test-status-tp28616849p28617028.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Andrea_Aime3 · May 20, 2010, 6:26am

VT@anonymised.com ha scritto:

Hi Justin,

My last build have everything passing including the wcs1.0.0 and those
errors that you have concluded with the wfs1.1.0

I did see an new error with running the wfs1.1.0 but it is not consistent.
My observation is that it doesn't fail all the time and sometimes when I
execute the test by itself it passes and other time it fails.

In the past I've seen hard to reproduce failures that were due to me
not resetting the testing database before restarting the test run.

Sounds familiar?

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

Ben_Caradoc-Davies · May 20, 2010, 6:58am

On 20/05/10 14:26, Andrea Aime wrote:

VT@anonymised.com ha scritto:

My last build have everything passing including the wcs1.0.0 and those
errors that you have concluded with the wfs1.1.0
I did see an new error with running the wfs1.1.0 but it is not consistent.
My observation is that it doesn't fail all the time and sometimes when I
execute the test by itself it passes and other time it fails.

In the past I've seen hard to reproduce failures that were due to me
not resetting the testing database before restarting the test run.
Sounds familiar?

Oh, yeah, I forgot about that. Well spotted, Andrea.

Victor, because WFS-T writes updates and thus changes the database contents, you need to reload the content of the database before every CITE WFS test.

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

VT1 · May 20, 2010, 7:00am

Yes you are right, I didn't reset the database. I will note that down thanks

Victor Tey
Software Engineer
ASRDC
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Phone: +61 8 6436 8944
Victor.Tey@...254... | www.csiro.au |
Address: Australian Resources Research Centre, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151
PLEASE NOTE
The information contained in this email may be confidential or privileged. Any unauthorised use or disclosure is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by return email. Thank you. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:aaime@…1501…]
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 2:27 PM
To: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] cite test status

VT@...2490... ha scritto: