Hi,
I was about to handle http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1105 (an easy and relaxing issue to fix I thought), that is, the problem feature types
are not sorted in the capabilities.
Hum, in fact they are not, and the three clients I tried, uDig, QGis and
Gaia, all report the feature types titles as they appear in the capabilities document.
I can easily sort on the title, all right, but the default title imho
is not so good. What if someone used namespaces to partition their data?
We did so in our sample data.
Wouldn't it be better if the default, out of the box title was equal to
namespace:typeName, instead of just then name followed by _Type?
Cheers
Andrea
Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
I was about to handle http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1105 (an easy and relaxing issue to fix I thought), that is, the problem feature types
are not sorted in the capabilities.
Hum, in fact they are not, and the three clients I tried, uDig, QGis and
Gaia, all report the feature types titles as they appear in the capabilities document.
I can easily sort on the title, all right, but the default title imho
is not so good. What if someone used namespaces to partition their data?
We did so in our sample data.
Wouldn't it be better if the default, out of the box title was equal to
namespace:typeName, instead of just then name followed by _Type?
I like that a lot. The _Type thing always bugged me a bit.
Chris
Cheers
Andrea
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
!DSPAM:4005,469cccd8310691336712104!