`Hi all,
I put together a proposal for the workspace specific settings discussed last week:
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+67±+Workspace+Local+Settings
Feedback much appreciated.
-Justin
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Thanks for putting this up Justin, looks good at a first glance.
I wonder though how all this affect GWC? like in does it work with the
integrated gwc out of the box (specially the virtual services work),
or what the gwc integration would need to consider to be called
virtual services + workspace local settings compatible?
Have you put any thought/testing onto that?
If not I'd like you to help me think about it. One thing that comes to
mind would be to make sure /<ws>/ows end points are respected by gwc.
Another would be for gwc to contribute its own ServiceInfo
implementations for its publishing services (tms, wmts, wmsc, etc), so
that they're catched up by the ws local settings page? anything else?
TIA,
Gabriel
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Justin Deoliveira
<jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
`Hi all,
I put together a proposal for the workspace specific settings discussed last
week:http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+67+-+Workspace+Local+Settings
Feedback much appreciated.
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
Hey Gabriel,
Good point. I haven’t put much thought into that and to be honest have more or less done no testing with gwc.
At first thought I think that it should “just work”. Since gwc operates behind the ows dispatcher, the thread local should be set and so gwc should see the same workspace local view of the catalog and configuration that the ows services see. But for sure some testing is in order. Not sure what a great test plan would be… i guess a simple test would be to try a “cachable” wms request, but though a virtual service endpoint and for a layer that resides in a different workspace. The result should be an error that the layer does not exist.
AS for gwc contributing its own ServiceInfo objects and having that play nice with the workspace local services stuff. Currently the way it is wired up is that the service gets listed on the workspace edit page if the service has an admin page. So that is why the gwc service objects don’t show up currently.
GWC follows a bit of a different pattern in than the typical services in that it aggregates a bunch of services (wmts, tms, etc…). The those ServiceInfo’s are wired up now they wouldn’t work with the workspace local services stuff. If they were first class citizens like the other ServiceInfo objects, that is persisted by GeoServerImpl, etc… then it would transparently work. And I guess adding individual ServiceAdminPage’s for them.
Anyways, something to talk through for sure. Perhaps we can do an IRC breakout.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Gabriel Roldan <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
Thanks for putting this up Justin, looks good at a first glance.
I wonder though how all this affect GWC? like in does it work with the
integrated gwc out of the box (specially the virtual services work),
or what the gwc integration would need to consider to be called
virtual services + workspace local settings compatible?
Have you put any thought/testing onto that?
If not I’d like you to help me think about it. One thing that comes to
mind would be to make sure //ows end points are respected by gwc.
Another would be for gwc to contribute its own ServiceInfo
implementations for its publishing services (tms, wmts, wmsc, etc), so
that they’re catched up by the ws local settings page? anything else?TIA,
GabrielOn Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Justin Deoliveira
<jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:`Hi all,
I put together a proposal for the workspace specific settings discussed last
week:http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+67±+Workspace+Local+Settings
Feedback much appreciated.
-Justin
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel–
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Hi Justin, Gabriel,
once you have clarified GWC questions, even if I do not envisage particular or blocking issues, you have my +1 on this GSIP.
If you plan to speak together on GWC please let us know what you decided.
Regards,
Alessio.
Please take note that GeoSolutions
will be closed for Christmas holidays
from 27/12 to 30/12
Ing. Alessio Fabiani
Founder / CTO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: (+39) 0584 96.23.13
fax: (+39) 0584 96.23.13
mobile:(+39) 331 62.33.686
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hey Gabriel,
Good point. I haven’t put much thought into that and to be honest have more or less done no testing with gwc.
At first thought I think that it should “just work”. Since gwc operates behind the ows dispatcher, the thread local should be set and so gwc should see the same workspace local view of the catalog and configuration that the ows services see. But for sure some testing is in order. Not sure what a great test plan would be… i guess a simple test would be to try a “cachable” wms request, but though a virtual service endpoint and for a layer that resides in a different workspace. The result should be an error that the layer does not exist.
AS for gwc contributing its own ServiceInfo objects and having that play nice with the workspace local services stuff. Currently the way it is wired up is that the service gets listed on the workspace edit page if the service has an admin page. So that is why the gwc service objects don’t show up currently.
GWC follows a bit of a different pattern in than the typical services in that it aggregates a bunch of services (wmts, tms, etc…). The those ServiceInfo’s are wired up now they wouldn’t work with the workspace local services stuff. If they were first class citizens like the other ServiceInfo objects, that is persisted by GeoServerImpl, etc… then it would transparently work. And I guess adding individual ServiceAdminPage’s for them.
Anyways, something to talk through for sure. Perhaps we can do an IRC breakout.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Gabriel Roldan <groldan@anonymised.com.> wrote:
Thanks for putting this up Justin, looks good at a first glance.
I wonder though how all this affect GWC? like in does it work with the
integrated gwc out of the box (specially the virtual services work),
or what the gwc integration would need to consider to be called
virtual services + workspace local settings compatible?
Have you put any thought/testing onto that?
If not I’d like you to help me think about it. One thing that comes to
mind would be to make sure //ows end points are respected by gwc.
Another would be for gwc to contribute its own ServiceInfo
implementations for its publishing services (tms, wmts, wmsc, etc), so
that they’re catched up by the ws local settings page? anything else?TIA,
GabrielOn Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Justin Deoliveira
<jdeolive@anonymised.com01…> wrote:`Hi all,
I put together a proposal for the workspace specific settings discussed last
week:http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+67±+Workspace+Local+Settings
Feedback much appreciated.
-Justin
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel–
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel