[Geoserver-devel] July 09 meeting minutes

GeoServer GeoServer Developer
,
1

GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012

Participants

Jody
Andrea
Justin
Alessio
Ben

Agenda

  • git switchover
  • 2.2-RC1 release (status)
  • 2.2-RC2 release
  • Reference WMS 1.3.0 Implementation
  • shapefile-ng store
  • PSC refresh

Git switchover

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3

Git switch complete.
Artifacts popping up, build server and cite tests

Issues finding the checkout/clone documentation

Pull requests are not getting notified. Workflow:

  • create jira (to be noticed)
  • pull request on github

Action items:

  • someone should reshuffle the dev docs so that the
    the checkout/clone docs are easier to find (Jody?)
  • Justin looking into ways to get notified anyways

2.2-RC1

Moving on today, feedback from people?
Victor tried it out, thumbs up, go ahead today,
and then Victor does blog and announcement

2.2-RC2

Victor to be doing next one in two weeks from
today and ask the community to test it, test it, test it

Action Items:

  • Victor does the release

Reference WMS 1.3.0 implementation

Wait for details from Cameron. OGC notification indicates August 5 deadline for participation.

Action Items:

  • Jody will see what is going on and report back

Shapefile DataStore NG

  • how to proceed?
  • lacks a dbtype unfortunately
  • if the old factory is there disable it?
  • just kick out the old and go with the new one and see how it goes for six months,
    by replacing all old references to that

Cruft

  • postgis-versioned getools / wfs-v

PSC refresh

  • Retired members: Rob Atkinson
  • Call for new volunteers
  • Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status

Action:

  • email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months meeting gap) (Ben)

  • refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody

  • review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what we actually are doing: (Justin)

  • Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

2

With respect to OGC wms reference implementation the OGC indicated that they are already in contact with Justin. Looks like they are changing to having more than one reference implementation and are aware geoserver passes CITE.

–
Jody

Sent with Sparrow

On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 2:11 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012

Participants

Jody
Andrea
Justin
Alessio
Ben

Agenda

  • git switchover
  • 2.2-RC1 release (status)
  • 2.2-RC2 release
  • Reference WMS 1.3.0 Implementation
  • shapefile-ng store
  • PSC refresh

Git switchover

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3

Git switch complete.
Artifacts popping up, build server and cite tests

Issues finding the checkout/clone documentation

Pull requests are not getting notified. Workflow:

  • create jira (to be noticed)
  • pull request on github

Action items:

  • someone should reshuffle the dev docs so that the
    the checkout/clone docs are easier to find (Jody?)
  • Justin looking into ways to get notified anyways

2.2-RC1

Moving on today, feedback from people?
Victor tried it out, thumbs up, go ahead today,
and then Victor does blog and announcement

2.2-RC2

Victor to be doing next one in two weeks from
today and ask the community to test it, test it, test it

Action Items:

  • Victor does the release

Reference WMS 1.3.0 implementation

Wait for details from Cameron. OGC notification indicates August 5 deadline for participation.

Action Items:

  • Jody will see what is going on and report back

Shapefile DataStore NG

  • how to proceed?
  • lacks a dbtype unfortunately
  • if the old factory is there disable it?
  • just kick out the old and go with the new one and see how it goes for six months,
    by replacing all old references to that

Cruft

  • postgis-versioned getools / wfs-v

PSC refresh

  • Retired members: Rob Atkinson
  • Call for new volunteers
  • Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status

Action:

  • email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months meeting gap) (Ben)

  • refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody

  • review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what we actually are doing: (Justin)

  • Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

3

Interesting. Indeed i was contacted today about the status of geoserver cite and explained that indeed we pass the latest cite test hot from their svn trunk which now includes all the patches i submitted. It sounds like this week or next they are going to update the official online engine hosted by the OGC at which time i will set up a server and run an official version of the tests, at which time i hope we can officially call geoserver cite compliant.

As for reference implementations, my understanding is that the policy has always been to have multiple reference implementations and that they don’t actually finalize things until they have three of them. Anyways, it will be great for geoserver to be a reference implementation of wms 1.3. Get to add another ri to the list :slight_smile:

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jody <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:

With respect to OGC wms reference implementation the OGC indicated that they are already in contact with Justin. Looks like they are changing to having more than one reference implementation and are aware geoserver passes CITE.

–
Jody

Sent with Sparrow

On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 2:11 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012

Participants

Jody
Andrea
Justin
Alessio
Ben

Agenda

  • git switchover
  • 2.2-RC1 release (status)
  • 2.2-RC2 release
  • Reference WMS 1.3.0 Implementation
  • shapefile-ng store
  • PSC refresh

Git switchover

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3

Git switch complete.
Artifacts popping up, build server and cite tests

Issues finding the checkout/clone documentation

Pull requests are not getting notified. Workflow:

  • create jira (to be noticed)
  • pull request on github

Action items:

  • someone should reshuffle the dev docs so that the
    the checkout/clone docs are easier to find (Jody?)
  • Justin looking into ways to get notified anyways

2.2-RC1

Moving on today, feedback from people?
Victor tried it out, thumbs up, go ahead today,
and then Victor does blog and announcement

2.2-RC2

Victor to be doing next one in two weeks from
today and ask the community to test it, test it, test it

Action Items:

  • Victor does the release

Reference WMS 1.3.0 implementation

Wait for details from Cameron. OGC notification indicates August 5 deadline for participation.

Action Items:

  • Jody will see what is going on and report back

Shapefile DataStore NG

  • how to proceed?
  • lacks a dbtype unfortunately
  • if the old factory is there disable it?
  • just kick out the old and go with the new one and see how it goes for six months,
    by replacing all old references to that

Cruft

  • postgis-versioned getools / wfs-v

PSC refresh

  • Retired members: Rob Atkinson
  • Call for new volunteers
  • Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status

Action:

  • email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months meeting gap) (Ben)

  • refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody

  • review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what we actually are doing: (Justin)

  • Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

4

Reading more carefully; they know you have been taking part in the cite email lists for the last month.

We probably do have to go through some song and dance to be a recognised reference implementation. With that in mind I would like to:
a) let cameron look into the details; until our next meeting; to see what he can figure out
b) sort out how to particpate in the next meeting (either give the nod to Cameron to proceed, or make our own plans if he is not interested)

Is it still the case that we have to pay to get CITE compliance? Or does your current participation cover let you run against the official version of the tests.

Jody Garnett

On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 11:37 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

Interesting. Indeed i was contacted today about the status of geoserver cite and explained that indeed we pass the latest cite test hot from their svn trunk which now includes all the patches i submitted. It sounds like this week or next they are going to update the official online engine hosted by the OGC at which time i will set up a server and run an official version of the tests, at which time i hope we can officially call geoserver cite compliant.

As for reference implementations, my understanding is that the policy has always been to have multiple reference implementations and that they don’t actually finalize things until they have three of them. Anyways, it will be great for geoserver to be a reference implementation of wms 1.3. Get to add another ri to the list :slight_smile:

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jody <jody.garnett@anonymised.com.> wrote:

With respect to OGC wms reference implementation the OGC indicated that they are already in contact with Justin. Looks like they are changing to having more than one reference implementation and are aware geoserver passes CITE.

–
Jody

Sent with Sparrow

On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 2:11 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012

Participants

Jody
Andrea
Justin
Alessio
Ben

Agenda

  • git switchover
  • 2.2-RC1 release (status)
  • 2.2-RC2 release
  • Reference WMS 1.3.0 Implementation
  • shapefile-ng store
  • PSC refresh

Git switchover

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3

Git switch complete.
Artifacts popping up, build server and cite tests

Issues finding the checkout/clone documentation

Pull requests are not getting notified. Workflow:

  • create jira (to be noticed)
  • pull request on github

Action items:

  • someone should reshuffle the dev docs so that the
    the checkout/clone docs are easier to find (Jody?)
  • Justin looking into ways to get notified anyways

2.2-RC1

Moving on today, feedback from people?
Victor tried it out, thumbs up, go ahead today,
and then Victor does blog and announcement

2.2-RC2

Victor to be doing next one in two weeks from
today and ask the community to test it, test it, test it

Action Items:

  • Victor does the release

Reference WMS 1.3.0 implementation

Wait for details from Cameron. OGC notification indicates August 5 deadline for participation.

Action Items:

  • Jody will see what is going on and report back

Shapefile DataStore NG

  • how to proceed?
  • lacks a dbtype unfortunately
  • if the old factory is there disable it?
  • just kick out the old and go with the new one and see how it goes for six months,
    by replacing all old references to that

Cruft

  • postgis-versioned getools / wfs-v

PSC refresh

  • Retired members: Rob Atkinson
  • Call for new volunteers
  • Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status

Action:

  • email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months meeting gap) (Ben)

  • refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody

  • review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what we actually are doing: (Justin)

  • Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

5

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:

Reading more carefully; they know you have been taking part in the cite email lists for the last month.

We probably do have to go through some song and dance to be a recognised reference implementation. With that in mind I would like to:
a) let cameron look into the details; until our next meeting; to see what he can figure out
b) sort out how to particpate in the next meeting (either give the nod to Cameron to proceed, or make our own plans if he is not interested)

Ok with (a). For (b) I was already planning to do an official test run as this is really a community concern orthogonal to any of the ows cite initiatives.

Is it still the case that we have to pay to get CITE compliance? Or does your current participation cover let you run against the official version of the tests.

Not sure, good question. I guess I will find out soon enough.

–
Jody Garnett

On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 11:37 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

Interesting. Indeed i was contacted today about the status of geoserver cite and explained that indeed we pass the latest cite test hot from their svn trunk which now includes all the patches i submitted. It sounds like this week or next they are going to update the official online engine hosted by the OGC at which time i will set up a server and run an official version of the tests, at which time i hope we can officially call geoserver cite compliant.

As for reference implementations, my understanding is that the policy has always been to have multiple reference implementations and that they don’t actually finalize things until they have three of them. Anyways, it will be great for geoserver to be a reference implementation of wms 1.3. Get to add another ri to the list :slight_smile:

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jody <jody.garnett@anonymised.com.> wrote:

With respect to OGC wms reference implementation the OGC indicated that they are already in contact with Justin. Looks like they are changing to having more than one reference implementation and are aware geoserver passes CITE.

–
Jody

Sent with Sparrow

On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 2:11 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012

Participants

Jody
Andrea
Justin
Alessio
Ben

Agenda

  • git switchover
  • 2.2-RC1 release (status)
  • 2.2-RC2 release
  • Reference WMS 1.3.0 Implementation
  • shapefile-ng store
  • PSC refresh

Git switchover

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3

Git switch complete.
Artifacts popping up, build server and cite tests

Issues finding the checkout/clone documentation

Pull requests are not getting notified. Workflow:

  • create jira (to be noticed)
  • pull request on github

Action items:

  • someone should reshuffle the dev docs so that the
    the checkout/clone docs are easier to find (Jody?)
  • Justin looking into ways to get notified anyways

2.2-RC1

Moving on today, feedback from people?
Victor tried it out, thumbs up, go ahead today,
and then Victor does blog and announcement

2.2-RC2

Victor to be doing next one in two weeks from
today and ask the community to test it, test it, test it

Action Items:

  • Victor does the release

Reference WMS 1.3.0 implementation

Wait for details from Cameron. OGC notification indicates August 5 deadline for participation.

Action Items:

  • Jody will see what is going on and report back

Shapefile DataStore NG

  • how to proceed?
  • lacks a dbtype unfortunately
  • if the old factory is there disable it?
  • just kick out the old and go with the new one and see how it goes for six months,
    by replacing all old references to that

Cruft

  • postgis-versioned getools / wfs-v

PSC refresh

  • Retired members: Rob Atkinson
  • Call for new volunteers
  • Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status

Action:

  • email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months meeting gap) (Ben)

  • refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody

  • review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what we actually are doing: (Justin)

  • Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

6

At Monday's meeting, we discussed the GeoServer Project Steering Committee. (Any GeoTools Project Management Committee review will be held at a later data.)

The PSC rules were written when regular IRC meetings were held. Here are the current PSC policies:
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/psc.html

Note that "status on PSC is lost if not active at all in a two month period of time".

As we have now been having GeoServer PSC teleconferences (fortnightly on Mondays at 13:00 UTC) for over two months, all PSC members who have not yet attended a Skype teleconference but wish to remain on the PSC must either attend the Skype teleconference on Monday 23 July at 13:00 UTC or send their apologies (or give some other indication that they are active?). If we do not hear from you, you will be assumed to have stepped down.

Next GeoTools/GeoServer meeting (anyone can attend, get on IRC GeoServer on freenode to ask):
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20120723T13&ah=1

We also call for nominations for the GeoServer PSC. Anyone interested in joining the PSC (including rejoining former PSC members), please attend the next meeting or otherwise make yourself known. It is not mandatory to attend meetings, but it is mandatory to be active; those who have other commitments and cannot attend meetings are welcome to participate through email, voting on GSIPs, and similar activities.

Kind regards,
Ben.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Geotools-devel] July 09 meeting minutes
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:11:04 +0800
From: Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>
To: Geotools-Devel list <geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012

[...]

PSC refresh
-------------

- Retired members: Rob Atkinson
- Call for new volunteers
- Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status

Action:
- email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months
meeting gap) (Ben)
- refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody
- review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what
we actually are doing: (Justin)

- Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

7

+1

:slight_smile:

==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information.

Ing. Alessio Fabiani
@alfa7691
Founder/Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 331 6233686

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com> wrote:

At Monday’s meeting, we discussed the GeoServer Project Steering
Committee. (Any GeoTools Project Management Committee review will be
held at a later data.)

The PSC rules were written when regular IRC meetings were held. Here
are the current PSC policies:
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/psc.html

Note that “status on PSC is lost if not active at all in a two month
period of time”.

As we have now been having GeoServer PSC teleconferences (fortnightly on
Mondays at 13:00 UTC) for over two months, all PSC members who have not
yet attended a Skype teleconference but wish to remain on the PSC must
either attend the Skype teleconference on Monday 23 July at 13:00 UTC or
send their apologies (or give some other indication that they are
active?). If we do not hear from you, you will be assumed to have
stepped down.

Next GeoTools/GeoServer meeting (anyone can attend, get on IRC
GeoServer on freenode to ask):
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20120723T13&ah=1

We also call for nominations for the GeoServer PSC. Anyone interested in
joining the PSC (including rejoining former PSC members), please attend
the next meeting or otherwise make yourself known. It is not mandatory
to attend meetings, but it is mandatory to be active; those who have
other commitments and cannot attend meetings are welcome to participate
through email, voting on GSIPs, and similar activities.

Kind regards,
Ben.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Geotools-devel] July 09 meeting minutes
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:11:04 +0800
From: Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>
To: Geotools-Devel list <geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
“geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net”
<geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012

[…]

PSC refresh

  • Retired members: Rob Atkinson
  • Call for new volunteers
  • Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status

Action:

  • email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months
    meeting gap) (Ben)

  • refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody

  • review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what
    we actually are doing: (Justin)

  • Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.

–
Ben Caradoc-Davies Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

8

On 11/07/12 15:52, Alessio Fabiani wrote:

+1

:slight_smile:

Ha ha!

(For the benefit of the list, Alessio *has* attended meetings, and this vote is *not* his only activity, although it would be even funnier if it were.)

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

9

As one that has not attended yet, have also my +1. I'm also expressing
here my interest on keep being part of the GeoServer PSC, disregard
not having attended the meetings so far. I will try my best to be on
all next ones that I can, but for the ones I can't make, accept my
apologies in advance.
Hopefully it will be easier for me to attend from now on now that the
family issues that kept me busy on Monday mornings are settling down
(one child with a broken leg, another newborn).

Cheers,
Gabriel

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com> wrote:

On 11/07/12 15:52, Alessio Fabiani wrote:

+1

:slight_smile:

Ha ha!

(For the benefit of the list, Alessio *has* attended meetings, and this
vote is *not* his only activity, although it would be even funnier if it
were.)

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

10

I am not sure about putting such an emphasis on the meetings as required to show the necessary participation to be part of the PSC. Given we are radically spread out across the globe it is not just doable for a lot of people, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t active.

To me the biggest thing in the evaluation of activity should be proposal voting taking the time to review proposals. Even if someone attended every meeting but generally never provides any feedback or votes for a proposal I would think they should still consider stepping down.

$0.02

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Gabriel Roldan <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:

As one that has not attended yet, have also my +1. I’m also expressing
here my interest on keep being part of the GeoServer PSC, disregard
not having attended the meetings so far. I will try my best to be on
all next ones that I can, but for the ones I can’t make, accept my
apologies in advance.
Hopefully it will be easier for me to attend from now on now that the
family issues that kept me busy on Monday mornings are settling down
(one child with a broken leg, another newborn).

Cheers,
Gabriel

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com wrote:

On 11/07/12 15:52, Alessio Fabiani wrote:

+1

:slight_smile:

Ha ha!

(For the benefit of the list, Alessio has attended meetings, and this
vote is not his only activity, although it would be even funnier if it
were.)

–
Ben Caradoc-Davies Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

–
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

11

I second Justin here, although honestly my judgment is a bit biased
by the fact that attending meetings si going to be difficult for me in
some periods (like now).
While I am one of those who pushed to have regular meetings I believe
we should be careful on putting too much emphasis on them for deciding
whether or not someone should be PSC or not, however I agree that if
one can not attend he should at least notify the others (I am talking
myself as well here :slight_smile: ).

Anyway, this should probably represent a 0.

Regards,
Simone Giannecchini

Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for
more information.

Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

I am not sure about putting such an emphasis on the meetings as required to
show the necessary participation to be part of the PSC. Given we are
radically spread out across the globe it is not just doable for a lot of
people, but that doesn't mean they aren't active.

To me the biggest thing in the evaluation of activity should be proposal
voting taking the time to review proposals. Even if someone attended every
meeting but generally never provides any feedback or votes for a proposal I
would think they should still consider stepping down.

$0.02

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Gabriel Roldan <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:

As one that has not attended yet, have also my +1. I'm also expressing
here my interest on keep being part of the GeoServer PSC, disregard
not having attended the meetings so far. I will try my best to be on
all next ones that I can, but for the ones I can't make, accept my
apologies in advance.
Hopefully it will be easier for me to attend from now on now that the
family issues that kept me busy on Monday mornings are settling down
(one child with a broken leg, another newborn).

Cheers,
Gabriel

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com> wrote:
> On 11/07/12 15:52, Alessio Fabiani wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> :slight_smile:
>
> Ha ha!
>
> (For the benefit of the list, Alessio *has* attended meetings, and this
> vote is *not* his only activity, although it would be even funnier if it
> were.)
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
> Software Engineer
> CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
> Australian Resources Research Centre
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
> Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
> malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

12

+1. Attending meetings is great if you can, but reviewing and voting on proposals in both necessary and sufficient to be on the PSC.

I was thinking of people with family obligations when I wrote: "It is not mandatory to attend meetings, but it is mandatory to be active; those who have other commitments and cannot attend meetings are welcome to participate through email, voting on GSIPs, and similar activities."

I would like the PSC to be as broad as possible, as long as everyone on it is active.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 11/07/12 23:44, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

I am not sure about putting such an emphasis on the meetings as required
to show the necessary participation to be part of the PSC. Given we are
radically spread out across the globe it is not just doable for a lot of
people, but that doesn't mean they aren't active.

To me the biggest thing in the evaluation of activity should be proposal
voting taking the time to review proposals. Even if someone attended
every meeting but generally never provides any feedback or votes for a
proposal I would think they should still consider stepping down.

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

13

Reminder: GeoServer/GeoTools meeting today (Monday 23 July) at 13:00 UTC.

On 11/07/12 13:47, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:

At Monday's meeting, we discussed the GeoServer Project Steering
Committee. (Any GeoTools Project Management Committee review will be
held at a later data.)

The PSC rules were written when regular IRC meetings were held. Here
are the current PSC policies:
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/psc.html

Note that "status on PSC is lost if not active at all in a two month
period of time".

As we have now been having GeoServer PSC teleconferences (fortnightly on
Mondays at 13:00 UTC) for over two months, all PSC members who have not
yet attended a Skype teleconference but wish to remain on the PSC must
either attend the Skype teleconference on Monday 23 July at 13:00 UTC or
send their apologies (or give some other indication that they are
active?). If we do not hear from you, you will be assumed to have
stepped down.

Next GeoTools/GeoServer meeting (anyone can attend, get on IRC
GeoServer on freenode to ask):
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20120723T13&ah=1

We also call for nominations for the GeoServer PSC. Anyone interested in
joining the PSC (including rejoining former PSC members), please attend
the next meeting or otherwise make yourself known. It is not mandatory
to attend meetings, but it is mandatory to be active; those who have
other commitments and cannot attend meetings are welcome to participate
through email, voting on GSIPs, and similar activities.

Kind regards,
Ben.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Geotools-devel] July 09 meeting minutes
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:11:04 +0800
From: Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>
To: Geotools-Devel list <geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012

[...]

PSC refresh
-------------

- Retired members: Rob Atkinson
- Call for new volunteers
- Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status

Action:
- email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months
meeting gap) (Ben)
- refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody
- review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what
we actually are doing: (Justin)

- Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

14

Hi Everyone,

I would like to check in when we would like RC2 to be released or should we give it a bit more time for the dust to settle :slight_smile:

Victor

15

I would say let’s go ahead with RC2 soon if not this week. Given no show stopping bugs were found with RC1 we could probably go ahead and call this 2.2 final but I think another RC makes sense as well, which also seemed to be the popular vote at the meeting today.

So I leave it up to you Victor, but i am +1 on pushing it out now if you can coordinate the corresponding geotools release. I guess it will take a few days to get agreement on that.

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:14 PM, <Victor.Tey@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I would like to check in when we would like RC2 to be released or should we give it a bit more time for the dust to settle :slight_smile:

Victor

Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

16

I'd like to coordinate for the GWC 1.3 release too, so that 2.2 final
goes out with it.
And also have a pending patch to fix the GWC REST API (GEOS-4980)
which is a showstopper for some folks, and the re-arrangement of the
new gwc ui components into its own menu entry.

So I think that all can be done during this week. Would it be possible
to wait until, say, Friday? Even Thursday would be ok.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

I would say let's go ahead with RC2 soon if not this week. Given no show
stopping bugs were found with RC1 we could probably go ahead and call this
2.2 final but I think another RC makes sense as well, which also seemed to
be the popular vote at the meeting today.

So I leave it up to you Victor, but i am +1 on pushing it out now if you can
coordinate the corresponding geotools release. I guess it will take a few
days to get agreement on that.

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:14 PM, <Victor.Tey@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I would like to check in when we would like RC2 to be released or should
we give it a bit more time for the dust to settle :slight_smile:

Victor

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

17

That sounds great. I notify the gt list and see what are the response there but we should aim for this Friday. I will get back to this list once I confirm on gt.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriel Roldan [mailto:groldan@…1501…]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 7:40 AM
To: Justin Deoliveira
Cc: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington); geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.2-RC2

I'd like to coordinate for the GWC 1.3 release too, so that 2.2 final
goes out with it.
And also have a pending patch to fix the GWC REST API (GEOS-4980)
which is a showstopper for some folks, and the re-arrangement of the
new gwc ui components into its own menu entry.

So I think that all can be done during this week. Would it be possible
to wait until, say, Friday? Even Thursday would be ok.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@...1501...> wrote:

I would say let's go ahead with RC2 soon if not this week. Given no show
stopping bugs were found with RC1 we could probably go ahead and call this
2.2 final but I think another RC makes sense as well, which also seemed to
be the popular vote at the meeting today.

So I leave it up to you Victor, but i am +1 on pushing it out now if you can
coordinate the corresponding geotools release. I guess it will take a few
days to get agreement on that.

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:14 PM, <Victor.Tey@...254...> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I would like to check in when we would like RC2 to be released or should
we give it a bit more time for the dust to settle :slight_smile:

Victor

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

18

Thanks Victor,

I'm working full steam on any rough edge so that we can have gwc 1.3
final by Friday.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:15 PM, <Victor.Tey@anonymised.com> wrote:

That sounds great. I notify the gt list and see what are the response there but we should aim for this Friday. I will get back to this list once I confirm on gt.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriel Roldan [mailto:groldan@anonymised.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 7:40 AM
To: Justin Deoliveira
Cc: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington); geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.2-RC2

I'd like to coordinate for the GWC 1.3 release too, so that 2.2 final
goes out with it.
And also have a pending patch to fix the GWC REST API (GEOS-4980)
which is a showstopper for some folks, and the re-arrangement of the
new gwc ui components into its own menu entry.

So I think that all can be done during this week. Would it be possible
to wait until, say, Friday? Even Thursday would be ok.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

I would say let's go ahead with RC2 soon if not this week. Given no show
stopping bugs were found with RC1 we could probably go ahead and call this
2.2 final but I think another RC makes sense as well, which also seemed to
be the popular vote at the meeting today.

So I leave it up to you Victor, but i am +1 on pushing it out now if you can
coordinate the corresponding geotools release. I guess it will take a few
days to get agreement on that.

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:14 PM, <Victor.Tey@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I would like to check in when we would like RC2 to be released or should
we give it a bit more time for the dust to settle :slight_smile:

Victor

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

19

I'm sorry for missing the last meeting, but I fell ill and just
couldn't be online.

I've been having a hard look at my involvement on the PSC and while I
would like to say otherwise I don't feel I've been a productive
member. I don't see a realistic way at the moment to change that. I
think I've fallen well behind on the expected level of activity and my
timeliness on reviewing GSIPs and the like really isn't sufficient to
be useful. I think it's appropriate that I step down from the PSC to
make room for others.

--
Mark

On 11 July 2012 15:47, Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com> wrote:

At Monday's meeting, we discussed the GeoServer Project Steering
Committee. (Any GeoTools Project Management Committee review will be
held at a later data.)

The PSC rules were written when regular IRC meetings were held. Here
are the current PSC policies:
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/psc.html

Note that "status on PSC is lost if not active at all in a two month
period of time".

As we have now been having GeoServer PSC teleconferences (fortnightly on
Mondays at 13:00 UTC) for over two months, all PSC members who have not
yet attended a Skype teleconference but wish to remain on the PSC must
either attend the Skype teleconference on Monday 23 July at 13:00 UTC or
send their apologies (or give some other indication that they are
active?). If we do not hear from you, you will be assumed to have
stepped down.

Next GeoTools/GeoServer meeting (anyone can attend, get on IRC
GeoServer on freenode to ask):
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20120723T13&ah=1

We also call for nominations for the GeoServer PSC. Anyone interested in
joining the PSC (including rejoining former PSC members), please attend
the next meeting or otherwise make yourself known. It is not mandatory
to attend meetings, but it is mandatory to be active; those who have
other commitments and cannot attend meetings are welcome to participate
through email, voting on GSIPs, and similar activities.

Kind regards,
Ben.

20

Thanks for letting us know, Mark. We look forward to your ongoing contributions.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 27/07/12 11:40, Mark Leslie wrote:

I'm sorry for missing the last meeting, but I fell ill and just
couldn't be online.

I've been having a hard look at my involvement on the PSC and while I
would like to say otherwise I don't feel I've been a productive
member. I don't see a realistic way at the moment to change that. I
think I've fallen well behind on the expected level of activity and my
timeliness on reviewing GSIPs and the like really isn't sufficient to
be useful. I think it's appropriate that I step down from the PSC to
make room for others.

--
Mark

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre