Hi,
I'm looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking
the RC5 release:
- overnight the dependency towards GWC was moved to SNAPSHOT again
with a commit log saying "set GWC dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT to
catch up on GWC bug fixes".
Yumm... bug fixes 
But... RC5 might turn into the final, is there any way to tag GWC
and call it, dunno, 1.2.5.1?
1.2.6? 1.2-for.the.sake.of.GS.2.1.RC5?
So that we know what we were depending onto?
- http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4425 This baby spawned at least
3 bug reports plus
assorted complaints all around, I think I have a fix but it needs a review
- http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4421 This one is a regression,
it was possible to
disable the security subsystem in 2.0.x, but no more now
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:00 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking
the RC5 release:
- overnight the dependency towards GWC was moved to SNAPSHOT again
with a commit log saying "set GWC dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT to
catch up on GWC bug fixes".
Yumm... bug fixes
yup, at least you don't want to be able of using jpeg tiles
(GEOS-4492)
I've been working on the 1.2.6 bugfix list in order to get there for GS
R5 and hopefully stick to that and not need a 1.2.7 for the final GS
2.1.0, or RC6 if more regressions arise.
But... RC5 might turn into the final, is there any way to tag GWC
and call it, dunno, 1.2.5.1?
1.2.6? 1.2-for.the.sake.of.GS.2.1.RC5?
that.is.the.idea
cheers,
Gabriel
So that we know what we were depending onto?
- http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4425 This baby spawned at least
3 bug reports plus
assorted complaints all around, I think I have a fix but it needs a review
- http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4421 This one is a regression,
it was possible to
disable the security subsystem in 2.0.x, but no more now
Cheers
Andrea
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:00 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking
the RC5 release:
- overnight the dependency towards GWC was moved to SNAPSHOT again
with a commit log saying "set GWC dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT to
catch up on GWC bug fixes".
Yumm... bug fixes
yup, at least you don't want to be able of using jpeg tiles
(GEOS-4492)
I've been working on the 1.2.6 bugfix list in order to get there for GS
R5 and hopefully stick to that and not need a 1.2.7 for the final GS
2.1.0, or RC6 if more regressions arise.
But... RC5 might turn into the final, is there any way to tag GWC
and call it, dunno, 1.2.5.1?
1.2.6? 1.2-for.the.sake.of.GS.2.1.RC5?
that.is.the.idea
Ok cool. RC5 was supposed to happen today, thought I migth not
be able to do it due to a couple of jiras in need of review.
Hopefully RC5 will be re-released as final, too (finger crossed).
When do you think "that.is.the.idea" version will be deployed on the
maven repos?
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:08 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:00 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking
>> the RC5 release:
>> - overnight the dependency towards GWC was moved to SNAPSHOT again
>> with a commit log saying "set GWC dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT to
>> catch up on GWC bug fixes".
>> Yumm... bug fixes
> yup, at least you don't want to be able of using jpeg tiles
> (GEOS-4492)
>
> I've been working on the 1.2.6 bugfix list in order to get there for GS
> R5 and hopefully stick to that and not need a 1.2.7 for the final GS
> 2.1.0, or RC6 if more regressions arise.
>
>> But... RC5 might turn into the final, is there any way to tag GWC
>> and call it, dunno, 1.2.5.1?
>> 1.2.6? 1.2-for.the.sake.of.GS.2.1.RC5?
> that.is.the.idea
Ok cool. RC5 was supposed to happen today, thought I migth not
be able to do it due to a couple of jiras in need of review.
Hopefully RC5 will be re-released as final, too (finger crossed).
When do you think "that.is.the.idea" version will be deployed on the
maven repos?
There's only one issue left[1] that I think I'll let slip to the next
version cause I'm running out of spare time. So whenever you want. I
think later today after working hours I can go through the release
cycle, it's lighter than geosever's anyway.
would that work? are you planning waiting until tomorrow for RC5 or you
think you'll tag today? if so just tell me and we'll handle it.
Cheers,
Gabriel
[1]<https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/issues?direction=desc&milestone=1>
Cheers
Andrea
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
e, it's lighter than geosever's anyway.
would that work? are you planning waiting until tomorrow for RC5 or you
think you'll tag today? if so just tell me and we'll handle it.
Hum... I guess RC5 will have to be postponed to tomorrow, by the time Justin
wakes up and can give me a review on the two remaining issues I'll be
stuck in meetings without
a possibility to act on the release, so I guess I'll try to do it
tomorrow morning instead
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:24 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
e, it's lighter than geosever's anyway.
> would that work? are you planning waiting until tomorrow for RC5 or you
> think you'll tag today? if so just tell me and we'll handle it.
Hum... I guess RC5 will have to be postponed to tomorrow, by the time Justin
wakes up and can give me a review on the two remaining issues I'll be
stuck in meetings without
a possibility to act on the release, so I guess I'll try to do it
tomorrow morning instead
okay, sounds like a plan. I'll make sure 1.2.6 is out by then.
Cheers,
Gabriel
Cheers
Andrea
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
I’m looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking
the RC5 release:
- overnight the dependency towards GWC was moved to SNAPSHOT again
with a commit log saying “set GWC dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT to
catch up on GWC bug fixes”.
Yumm… bug fixes
But… RC5 might turn into the final, is there any way to tag GWC
and call it, dunno, 1.2.5.1?
1.2.6? 1.2-for.the.sake.of.GS.2.1.RC5?
So that we know what we were depending onto?
- http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4425 This baby spawned at least
3 bug reports plus
assorted complaints all around, I think I have a fix but it needs a review
I’ll do my best to review these by end of day. Sorry for the delay.
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation – Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:08 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:00 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking
>> the RC5 release:
>> - overnight the dependency towards GWC was moved to SNAPSHOT again
>> with a commit log saying "set GWC dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT to
>> catch up on GWC bug fixes".
>> Yumm... bug fixes
> yup, at least you don't want to be able of using jpeg tiles
> (GEOS-4492)
>
> I've been working on the 1.2.6 bugfix list in order to get there for GS
> R5 and hopefully stick to that and not need a 1.2.7 for the final GS
> 2.1.0, or RC6 if more regressions arise.
>
>> But... RC5 might turn into the final, is there any way to tag GWC
>> and call it, dunno, 1.2.5.1?
>> 1.2.6? 1.2-for.the.sake.of.GS.2.1.RC5?
> that.is.the.idea
Ok cool. RC5 was supposed to happen today, thought I migth not
be able to do it due to a couple of jiras in need of review.
Hopefully RC5 will be re-released as final, too (finger crossed).
When do you think "that.is.the.idea" version will be deployed on the
maven repos?
There's only one issue left[1] that I think I'll let slip to the next
version cause I'm running out of spare time. So whenever you want. I
think later today after working hours I can go through the release
cycle, it's lighter than geosever's anyway.
would that work? are you planning waiting until tomorrow for RC5 or you
think you'll tag today? if so just tell me and we'll handle it.
Hi Gabriel,
I'm rounding up the latest fixes for GS now. I don't see GWC 1.2.6 in
the opengeo repo thought:
http://repo.opengeo.org/org/geowebcache/gwc-core/
nor I see a 1.2.6 tag on GitHub.
I guess like this we're not going to be able to do the release?
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:14 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:08 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:00 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I'm looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking
>> >> the RC5 release:
>> >> - overnight the dependency towards GWC was moved to SNAPSHOT again
>> >> with a commit log saying "set GWC dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT to
>> >> catch up on GWC bug fixes".
>> >> Yumm... bug fixes
>> > yup, at least you don't want to be able of using jpeg tiles
>> > (GEOS-4492)
>> >
>> > I've been working on the 1.2.6 bugfix list in order to get there for GS
>> > R5 and hopefully stick to that and not need a 1.2.7 for the final GS
>> > 2.1.0, or RC6 if more regressions arise.
>> >
>> >> But... RC5 might turn into the final, is there any way to tag GWC
>> >> and call it, dunno, 1.2.5.1?
>> >> 1.2.6? 1.2-for.the.sake.of.GS.2.1.RC5?
>> > that.is.the.idea
>>
>> Ok cool. RC5 was supposed to happen today, thought I migth not
>> be able to do it due to a couple of jiras in need of review.
>> Hopefully RC5 will be re-released as final, too (finger crossed).
>> When do you think "that.is.the.idea" version will be deployed on the
>> maven repos?
>
> There's only one issue left[1] that I think I'll let slip to the next
> version cause I'm running out of spare time. So whenever you want. I
> think later today after working hours I can go through the release
> cycle, it's lighter than geosever's anyway.
>
> would that work? are you planning waiting until tomorrow for RC5 or you
> think you'll tag today? if so just tell me and we'll handle it.
Hi Gabriel,
I'm rounding up the latest fixes for GS now. I don't see GWC 1.2.6 in
the opengeo repo thought:
http://repo.opengeo.org/org/geowebcache/gwc-core/
nor I see a 1.2.6 tag on GitHub.
hey sorry for the delay, I'm making the tag right away, hope we're still
in time.
Cheers,
Gabriel
I guess like this we're not going to be able to do the release?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
hey sorry for the delay, I'm making the tag right away, hope we're still
in time.
Err... saw the commit going in, but I'm left with one hour or so of work so
it's not even enough time to do one of the uploads (takes 2-3 hours to upload
everything from here)
I guess I'll start today with geotools build and deploy and finish up tomorrow
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
I'm going to back port some upgrades to the INSPIRE community module.
As it's not part of the build I don't think there should be a problem
even though you already tagged RC5. But just to check?
Cheers,
Gabriel
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:37 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
> hey sorry for the delay, I'm making the tag right away, hope we're still
> in time.
Err... saw the commit going in, but I'm left with one hour or so of work so
it's not even enough time to do one of the uploads (takes 2-3 hours to upload
everything from here)
I guess I'll start today with geotools build and deploy and finish up tomorrow
Cheers
Andrea
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
I'm going to back port some upgrades to the INSPIRE community module.
As it's not part of the build I don't think there should be a problem
even though you already tagged RC5. But just to check?
Should not be a problem, I won't back port in the RC5 branch the changes
you're going to make
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 21:38 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
> I'm going to back port some upgrades to the INSPIRE community module.
> As it's not part of the build I don't think there should be a problem
> even though you already tagged RC5. But just to check?
Should not be a problem, I won't back port in the RC5 branch the changes
you're going to make
yeah, there's no need to.
Cheers,
Gabriel
Cheers
Andrea
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers