Justin,
my pull request to remove xerces from gt-app-schema-resolver that you merged into your repo appears to have gotten lost in the rebasing and merging into geotools master:
https://github.com/jdeolive/geotools/pull/1
I just cherry-picked it onto geotools master as 690678886e56cb77add77fd9f94cdbc1ddc3fa89; this should be included in any backport to stable for full dexercesification.
(This really belongs on geotools-devel)
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 01/02/13 22:45, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Ok folks, changes pushed onto geotools and geoserver master.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com <mailto:Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>> wrote:
Light blue touch paper and stand back!
This is a dependency adjustment, not a functional change in the API,
so I do not believe a proposal is required.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 01/02/13 01:28, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
With the app-schema test issue resolved i believe the changes to
remove
xerces as a dependency are ready to go. All unit tests (both gs
and gt)
are passing and i just ran cite tests for gs with no problems.
So... shall we go ahead? Do we need a proposal for this one?
And then there is the question of where to push these changes?
Shall we
go with both 2.3.x and master? Or just let it sit on master for
a while?
I don't have a strong preference on this one.
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre