It may be just me but my preference would be that the textareas in the
UI were a bit less tall.
I'd like to apply the following patch to the css, in order to go from
A(.png) to B(.png). Any objection?
-------------
index 5e0737e..17bdbe9 100644
--- a/web/core/src/main/java/org/geoserver/web/css/geoserver.css
+++ b/web/core/src/main/java/org/geoserver/web/css/geoserver.css
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ width: 90%;
}
textarea.medium {
-height: 10em;
+height: 5em;
}
input.large, select.large, textarea.large {
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ height: 18px;
textarea.textarea {
font-family: "Lucida Grande",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;
-height: 15em;
+height: 5em;
width: 33em;
}
---------------
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers
(attachments)
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
It may be just me but my preference would be that the textareas in the
UI were a bit less tall.
I'd like to apply the following patch to the css, in order to go from
A(.png) to B(.png). Any objection?
I had a tour of the GUI and haven't seen anything badly affected by the change.
Speaking of personal preference, they become really tiny like that... what about
height: 7em;
width: 40em;
instead? A little taller than you suggested and a bit wider too.
See attached screenshot
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
(attachments)
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 10:13 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
> It may be just me but my preference would be that the textareas in the
> UI were a bit less tall.
> I'd like to apply the following patch to the css, in order to go from
> A(.png) to B(.png). Any objection?
I had a tour of the GUI and haven't seen anything badly affected by the change.
Speaking of personal preference, they become really tiny like that... what about
height: 7em;
width: 40em;
instead? A little taller than you suggested and a bit wider too.
See attached screenshot
works for me. Thanks for the quick turn around. So I'll apply the 7/50
change at least someone objects.
Cheers,
Gabriel
Cheers
Andrea
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com> wrote:
It may be just me but my preference would be that the textareas in the
UI were a bit less tall.
I’d like to apply the following patch to the css, in order to go from
A(.png) to B(.png). Any objection?
I had a tour of the GUI and haven’t seen anything badly affected by the change.
Speaking of personal preference, they become really tiny like that… what about
height: 7em;
width: 40em;
instead? A little taller than you suggested and a bit wider too.
See attached screenshot
+1 to Andrea’s sizing, FWIW.