[Geoserver-devel] Time to branch off to 2.0.x?

Hi,
while I'm desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but... cannot find
it anymore... oh well... if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

+1 from me. I have a bunch of commits to make one trunk frees up with regard to the resourcing publishing split. Currently i just have it in a local sandbox that is backed up, and i periodically keep it up to date, be nice to get it on trunk and have others start hitting it.

Andrea Aime wrote:

Hi,
while I'm desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but... cannot find
it anymore... oh well... if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

I am really waiting for feedback from testing of RC2; and I don't
think we will get it until a windows installer is made.

Any update on the production of the release candidate 2?

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

+1 from me. I have a bunch of commits to make one trunk frees up with
regard to the resourcing publishing split. Currently i just have it in a
local sandbox that is backed up, and i periodically keep it up to date,
be nice to get it on trunk and have others start hitting it.

Andrea Aime wrote:

Hi,
while I'm desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but... cannot find
it anymore... oh well... if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

+1

We have some plans to make proposal about refactoring a bit the
catalog and the Ui in order to better cope with non in-memory catalog
and this branching should help us out with going forward.

Simone.
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy

phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob: +39 333 8128928

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://simboss.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini

-------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Andrea Aime <aaime@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi,
while I'm desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but... cannot find
it anymore... oh well... if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

+1 here too, I also have few commits and patches to propose.


Eng. Alessio Fabiani
Founder / CTO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy

phone: +39 0584 980933
fax: +39 0584 983027
mob: +39 349 8227000

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Simone Giannecchini <simone.giannecchini@anonymised.com> wrote:

+1

We have some plans to make proposal about refactoring a bit the
catalog and the Ui in order to better cope with non in-memory catalog
and this branching should help us out with going forward.

Simone.

Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy

phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob: +39 333 8128928

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://simboss.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini


On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Andrea Aime <aaime@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi,
while I’m desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but… cannot find
it anymore… oh well… if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.


Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.


Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Seems like there is a strong push to branch; can I ask we all pitch in
and help produce the release candidate? We are leaning rather hard on
Andrea during a very busy week.

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:

I am really waiting for feedback from testing of RC2; and I don't
think we will get it until a windows installer is made.

Any update on the production of the release candidate 2?

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

+1 from me. I have a bunch of commits to make one trunk frees up with
regard to the resourcing publishing split. Currently i just have it in a
local sandbox that is backed up, and i periodically keep it up to date,
be nice to get it on trunk and have others start hitting it.

Andrea Aime wrote:

Hi,
while I'm desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but... cannot find
it anymore... oh well... if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Just a heads-up, I think app-schemas will need to fix things on the
2.0 branch - fixes for the major outstanding issues shouldnt need to
affect any other code if they are done cleanly.

I guess this leads to a question about WFS 2.0 and GML 3.2 support
though - it would be good to roll that into 2.0.x as well, if it can
be done safely enough. any thoughts?

Rob

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:

Seems like there is a strong push to branch; can I ask we all pitch in
and help produce the release candidate? We are leaning rather hard on
Andrea during a very busy week.

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:

I am really waiting for feedback from testing of RC2; and I don't
think we will get it until a windows installer is made.

Any update on the production of the release candidate 2?

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

+1 from me. I have a bunch of commits to make one trunk frees up with
regard to the resourcing publishing split. Currently i just have it in a
local sandbox that is backed up, and i periodically keep it up to date,
be nice to get it on trunk and have others start hitting it.

Andrea Aime wrote:

Hi,
while I'm desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but... cannot find
it anymore... oh well... if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Rob Atkinson wrote:

Just a heads-up, I think app-schemas will need to fix things on the
2.0 branch - fixes for the major outstanding issues shouldnt need to
affect any other code if they are done cleanly.

I guess this leads to a question about WFS 2.0 and GML 3.2 support
though - it would be good to roll that into 2.0.x as well, if it can
be done safely enough. any thoughts?

I think WFS 2.0 is a pretty major improvement, and would likely be a bit risky to try to get on to 2.0.x. At the very least I'd say it should be developed on trunk, and once it's stable then it can be ported back if it's actually a clean port. We are more modular than we were before, so it may be possible.

Doing app-schema fixes on both 2.0.x and trunk does make good sense to me.

Rob

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:

Seems like there is a strong push to branch; can I ask we all pitch in
and help produce the release candidate? We are leaning rather hard on
Andrea during a very busy week.

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:

I am really waiting for feedback from testing of RC2; and I don't
think we will get it until a windows installer is made.

Any update on the production of the release candidate 2?

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

+1 from me. I have a bunch of commits to make one trunk frees up with
regard to the resourcing publishing split. Currently i just have it in a
local sandbox that is backed up, and i periodically keep it up to date,
be nice to get it on trunk and have others start hitting it.

Andrea Aime wrote:

Hi,
while I'm desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but... cannot find
it anymore... oh well... if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Chris Holmes
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

+1

and also to confirm that I would expect any app-schema fixes should
follow the same basic principle too - develop on trunk, but the stable
branch is definitely the release target in this case.

I _was_ wondering if WFS 2.0 might require re-engineering which cant
be easily back-ported, and dont really have enough knowledge to guess,
but maybe there are some bits that can. Stored procedure stuff might
be an example of significantly different functionality we can do on
2.1, but support WFS 2.0 syntax on 2.0.X ? Obvioulsyt this depends on
two things - the business drivers and the technical issues, neither of
which is 100% clear to me at the moment :slight_smile:

rob

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Chris Holmes <cholmes@anonymised.com> wrote:

Rob Atkinson wrote:

Just a heads-up, I think app-schemas will need to fix things on the
2.0 branch - fixes for the major outstanding issues shouldnt need to
affect any other code if they are done cleanly.

I guess this leads to a question about WFS 2.0 and GML 3.2 support
though - it would be good to roll that into 2.0.x as well, if it can
be done safely enough. any thoughts?

I think WFS 2.0 is a pretty major improvement, and would likely be a bit
risky to try to get on to 2.0.x. At the very least I'd say it should be
developed on trunk, and once it's stable then it can be ported back if it's
actually a clean port. We are more modular than we were before, so it may
be possible.

Doing app-schema fixes on both 2.0.x and trunk does make good sense to me.

Rob

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
wrote:

Seems like there is a strong push to branch; can I ask we all pitch in
and help produce the release candidate? We are leaning rather hard on
Andrea during a very busy week.

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
wrote:

I am really waiting for feedback from testing of RC2; and I don't
think we will get it until a windows installer is made.

Any update on the production of the release candidate 2?

Jody

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Justin Deoliveira
<jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

+1 from me. I have a bunch of commits to make one trunk frees up with
regard to the resourcing publishing split. Currently i just have it in
a
local sandbox that is backed up, and i periodically keep it up to date,
be nice to get it on trunk and have others start hitting it.

Andrea Aime wrote:

Hi,
while I'm desperately trying to find some scrap of time
to cut and release 2.0-RC2 I realized it would be a good
time to branch off to the 2.0.x branch and leave
trunk for new developments.

What do you think?

Cheers
Andrea

PS: I thought I already sent out this mail but... cannot find
it anymore... oh well... if it is the second time you see it,
apologies.

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart
your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and
stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Chris Holmes
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.