Hi List,
I’m seeing some very odd behaviour with external graphics.
The TextSymboliser is this:
road_no
Arial
10
bold
0.5
0.5
0
0
#FFFFFF
image/svg+xml
450
stretch
4
200
500
10
yes
This works fine in Oracle, but when coming from a PostGIS source, it is rendered as as bar:
If I remove the stretch line, it turns into a huge blob (only a small section is shown here - same scale image):
This is GeoServer 2.8.5. I think this may be a regression from 2.7.1. I don’t remember seeing it in the 2.7.1 deployment and it’s pretty obvious (just upgraded to 2.8.5).
I’ve disabled feature simplification, loose bboxes, and
Does anyone have any thoughts/experience with this? It seems odd that the data-store is making a difference to a style.
Cheers,
Jonathan
Hi Jonathan,
your mail seems to imply there were images, but I got none.
In any case, it seems indeed odd that just changing the database results in such a difference, and
cannot think of any reason for this to happen.
I’d go ahead and investigate more, if you find a way to reproduce, open a ticket with the necessary info
(sample data, style and so on) as it might be a good candidate for the monthly bug sprint fixes
Cheers
Andrea
···
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Jonathan Moules <jonathan-lists@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi List,
I’m seeing some very odd behaviour with external graphics.
The TextSymboliser is this:
road_no
Arial
10
bold
0.5
0.5
0
0
#FFFFFF
image/svg+xml
450
stretch
4
200
500
10
yes
This works fine in Oracle, but when coming from a PostGIS source, it is rendered as as bar:
If I remove the stretch line, it turns into a huge blob (only a small section is shown here - same scale image):
This is GeoServer 2.8.5. I think this may be a regression from 2.7.1. I don’t remember seeing it in the 2.7.1 deployment and it’s pretty obvious (just upgraded to 2.8.5).
I’ve disabled feature simplification, loose bboxes, and
Does anyone have any thoughts/experience with this? It seems odd that the data-store is making a difference to a style.
Cheers,
Jonathan
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@anonymised.com.382…sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
–
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy’s New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.