-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Salve.
Come sapete, la prossima versione di QGIS avra' incorporato Sextante, attraverso il
quale sara' facile realizzare analisi anche molto sofisticate.
Per facilitare gli utenti nella ricerca dell'analisi giusta, e' cruciale che i
centinaia di moduli (540 ad ora) siano classificati in modo ragionevole. Non e'
ragionevole chiedere ad uno sviluppatore di fare il lavoro di classificazione, che lo
distrae da compiti piu' complessi, ed e' piu' adeguato per gli utenti. Serve quindi
una mano per la classificazione. La cosa e' banalissima da fare: aprire un google doc
ed inserire il nome della categoria. Vedi sotto per dettagli. Se qualcosa non e'
chiaro, chiedete.
Forza!
Salulti.
- -------- Messaggio originale --------
Oggetto: Re: [Qgis-developer] Sextante test drive
Data: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:28:33 +0200
Mittente: Victor Olaya <volayaf@gmail.com>
A: Paolo Cavallini <cavallini@faunalia.it>
CC: William Kyngesburye <williamk@mappingspecialists.com>, William Kyngesburye
<woklist@kyngchaos.com>, qgis-developer <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org>
Paolo
You have convinced me: OTB and GRASS should be on the simplified list 
Now comes the hard part...classifying their algorithms...
I have already done it for OTB, since the names and groups are usable.
GRASS ones are clearly not...which means that we need not only to set
a group, but an alternative name for each GRASS module...
If anyone feels like helping, here is the link to a google spreadsheet
where the classification can be edited
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Arf7VNv0yae5dGR4UjFMekxNVmg1blBUdWMweHJRYVE&usp=sharing
Thanks in advance for your help!
2013/4/20 Paolo Cavallini <cavallini@faunalia.it>:
Il 20/04/2013 17:24, William Kyngesburye ha scritto:
Just a note: I'll be bundling OTB and SAGA in the OS X package. I already have
code in sextante to automatically find the bundled copies.Thank you so much for this. So, Victor, paths could be set up as defaults in all
major platforms then, right?Maybe I'll look again at Taudem. I think when I looked at it a year ago I was put
off by Windows/Arc-centric nature of it. ... ugh, just a quick browse of theBad stuff, agreed. However, taudem has been properly packaged in Debian main, so I
suppose it can be brought to a reasonable state.
BTW, is it supported by an active community? Has anyone tried to contact the authors
suggestiong at least some basic fix?Thanks again.
All the best.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlFy3KMACgkQ/NedwLUzIr4dcACfaamf0qrAdO3TKI4AHwpAgxUx
qmUAmwfqdWgx87Du9wKOrG1WvKW3o6z8
=5lqr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----