2016-04-10 13:44 GMT+02:00 <svn_grass@osgeo.org>:
+ fields = line.rstrip('\r\n').split('|')
really '\r\n' ? Why not os.linesep? Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
Forgot to reply all…
–
Sent from my phone
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: “Huidae Cho” <grass4u@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 11, 2016 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r68240 - grass/trunk/scripts/v.report
To: “Martin Landa” <landa.martin@gmail.com>
Cc:
That was a copy+paste from the same script, but I think \r\n is safer than os.linesep just in case v.to.db prints out \r for whatever reason. But I know that won’t happen in non-Windows anyway, so os.linesep should be fine?
11 scripts use \r\n and 5 use os.linesep. g.extension uses \r\n for reading and os.linesep for printing.
Huidae
Sent from my phone
On Apr 10, 2016 7:49 AM, “Martin Landa” <landa.martin@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-04-10 13:44 GMT+02:00 <svn_grass@osgeo.org>:
- fields = line.rstrip(‘\r\n’).split(‘|’)
really ‘\r\n’ ? Why not os.linesep? Ma
–
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Huidae Cho <grass4u@gmail.com> wrote:
...
11 scripts use \r\n and 5 use os.linesep. g.extension uses \r\n for reading
and os.linesep for printing.
Any volunteer to homogenize that?
thanks
Markus
I don’t think we have a consensus yet…
–
Sent from my phone
On Apr 12, 2016 11:01 AM, “Markus Neteler” <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Huidae Cho <grass4u@gmail.com> wrote:
…11 scripts use \r\n and 5 use os.linesep. g.extension uses \r\n for reading
and os.linesep for printing.Any volunteer to homogenize that?
thanks
Markus