Hello all devs,
following recent movement into providing a greater transparency on
GRASS GIS analysis trustworthiness, I have created a first draft of
GRASS GIS errata framework proposal. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/5_Errata
Everyone is invited to improve it and provide feedback to prepare
final proposal.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Maris Nartiss <maris.gis@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all devs,
following recent movement into providing a greater transparency on
GRASS GIS analysis trustworthiness, I have created a first draft of
GRASS GIS errata framework proposal. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/5_Errata
Everyone is invited to improve it and provide feedback to prepare
final proposal.
Ok, found part of the problem: distance was always left as dy*dy +
dx*dx without ever taking the square root. This obviously changes the
weights as 1/10 is closer to 1/100 than 1/100 is to 1/10000...
The second is more difficult to describe, both fixed in r67211
Using the -n flag gave correct results, otherwise the results were
always wrong. The bug is present in GRASS 7.0.0 to 7.0.2.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Maris Nartiss <maris.gis@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all devs,
following recent movement into providing a greater transparency on
GRASS GIS analysis trustworthiness, I have created a first draft of
GRASS GIS errata framework proposal. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/5_Errata
This is a great draft!
Everyone is invited to improve it and provide feedback to prepare
final proposal.
At a first glance I have no substantial suggestions at all.
Other devs, please check the RFC5 proposal.