On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:00 AM, grass-dev-request@lists.osgeo.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:42:37 +0100
From: "Martin Landa" <landa.martin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] db.connect database= parameter is null
To: "Patton, Eric" <epatton@nrcan.gc.ca>
Cc: grass-user@lists.osgeo.org, grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Message-ID:
<f8fe65c40803120842y32e4ad67ja92fc32146713d4f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1Hi,
yes, see
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/7
It seems to me that the VAR file should defined for newly created
mapset by default to avoid possible problems.Martin
2008/3/12, Patton, Eric <epatton@nrcan.gc.ca>:
I created a new location using today's svn source, and noticed that db.connect doesn't have its database parameter pre-populated with $GISDBASE/$LOCATION_NAME/$MAPSET/dbf as it used to; it is now blank. Possible bug? Would it possible to get the module to at least populate $GISDBASE/$LOCATION_NAME/$MAPSET for this parameter?
~ Eric.
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
grass-dev Info Page--
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
I'm with Marcus and Martin on this. The potential for problems is high if this is not done; the cost to do it is very small. Can we just go ahead and make this change to g.proj?
Michael