Hi all,
I remember there was discussion about renaming wxgrass [1]. Before
wxgui will be used by users, I would like to raise this question
again.
I think we should rename wxgrass script to wxgui and create module
like g.gui or whatever (?)
Regards, Martin
[1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2007-August/032604.html
--
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
Hi,
what about PyGRASS GUI ?
will g.gui accept --gui-type flags?
jachym
Martin Landa píše v Pá 08. 02. 2008 v 16:41 +0100:
Hi all,
I remember there was discussion about renaming wxgrass [1]. Before
wxgui will be used by users, I would like to raise this question
again.I think we should rename wxgrass script to wxgui and create module
like g.gui or whatever (?)Regards, Martin
[1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2007-August/032604.html
--
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky@gmail.com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://www.les-ejk.cz/pgp/jachym_cepicky-gpg.pub
Ahoj,
2008/2/8, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky@gmail.com>:
what about PyGRASS GUI ?
?? You mean wxPython GUI?
will g.gui accept --gui-type flags?
yes, definitely it should
g.gui --gui-type=[wxpython|tcltk|oldtcltk]
tlctk == gis.m
oldtcltk == d.m
?
Martin
jachym
Martin Landa píše v Pá 08. 02. 2008 v 16:41 +0100:
> Hi all,
>
> I remember there was discussion about renaming wxgrass [1]. Before
> wxgui will be used by users, I would like to raise this question
> again.
>
> I think we should rename wxgrass script to wxgui and create module
> like g.gui or whatever (?)
>
> Regards, Martin
>
> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2007-August/032604.html
>
--
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky@gmail.com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://www.les-ejk.cz/pgp/jachym_cepicky-gpg.pub
--
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
On Feb 8, 2008 5:10 PM, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> wrote:
g.gui --gui-type=[wxpython|tcltk|oldtcltk]
tlctk == gis.m
oldtcltk == d.m
Looks good to me. And it should *remember* the preference for
the current location...
Markus
Martin Landa wrote:
I remember there was discussion about renaming wxgrass [1]. Before
wxgui will be used by users, I would like to raise this question
again.
...
[1]
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2007-August/032604.html
the whole thread, more ideas:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel/21880
I think we should rename wxgrass script to wxgui
+1, although it is a bit generic?
eg possible namespace collision with python-gnuradio. [apt-file search]
(that seems just to be a directory name, but ...)
I guess as long as it's an internal grass module and not in /usr/bin
it's ok?
and create module like g.gui or whatever (?)
+0 for the name. Sounds ok.
I suppose g.gui will be a script, and it should use the normal parser
unless there is some big reason not to. So --tcltk option would become
g.gui gui=[wxpy|tcltk|oldtcltk]
or whatever names you like, with the default set to ...
IIUC d.m and gis.m will be dropped for GRASS 7. I think it is ok to
mandate Python for GRASS 7 but we should keep it optional for GRASS 6.
.... So what language to write g.gui in?
Both /bin/sh + .bat versions depending on platform via Makefile magic?
Do it in C?
Hamish
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Hi,
2008/2/8, Hamish <hamish_b@yahoo.com>:
Martin Landa wrote:
> I remember there was discussion about renaming wxgrass [1]. Before
> wxgui will be used by users, I would like to raise this question
> again.
...
> [1]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2007-August/032604.htmlthe whole thread, more ideas:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel/21880> I think we should rename wxgrass script to wxgui
+1, although it is a bit generic?
eg possible namespace collision with python-gnuradio. [apt-file search]
(that seems just to be a directory name, but ...)
I guess as long as it's an internal grass module and not in /usr/bin
it's ok?
hm, wxgui is maybe too much generic name. When we have g.gui, we don't
need to copy wxgrass/wxgui script to $GISBASE/scripts. $GISBASE/etc/wx
(or better $GISBASE/etc/wxpython) would be sufficient place . The
wxgui will be started via g.gui type=wxpython.
> and create module like g.gui or whatever (?)
+0 for the name. Sounds ok.
I suppose g.gui will be a script, and it should use the normal parser
unless there is some big reason not to. So --tcltk option would become
g.gui gui=[wxpy|tcltk|oldtcltk]
or whatever names you like, with the default set to ...IIUC d.m and gis.m will be dropped for GRASS 7. I think it is ok to
+1
mandate Python for GRASS 7 but we should keep it optional for GRASS 6.
.... So what language to write g.gui in?
Both /bin/sh + .bat versions depending on platform via Makefile magic?
Do it in C?
Not sure, I wrote draft in C
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/43
Martin
--
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
Hi,
2008/2/9, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com>:
> > I remember there was discussion about renaming wxgrass [1]. Before
> > wxgui will be used by users, I would like to raise this question
> > again.
> ...
> > [1]
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2007-August/032604.html
>
> the whole thread, more ideas:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel/21880
>
>
> > I think we should rename wxgrass script to wxgui
>
> +1, although it is a bit generic?
> eg possible namespace collision with python-gnuradio. [apt-file search]
> (that seems just to be a directory name, but ...)
> I guess as long as it's an internal grass module and not in /usr/bin
> it's ok?hm, wxgui is maybe too much generic name. When we have g.gui, we don't
need to copy wxgrass/wxgui script to $GISBASE/scripts. $GISBASE/etc/wx
(or better $GISBASE/etc/wxpython) would be sufficient place . The
wxgui will be started via g.gui type=wxpython.> > and create module like g.gui or whatever (?)
>
> +0 for the name. Sounds ok.
>
> I suppose g.gui will be a script, and it should use the normal parser
> unless there is some big reason not to. So --tcltk option would become
> g.gui gui=[wxpy|tcltk|oldtcltk]
> or whatever names you like, with the default set to ...
>
> IIUC d.m and gis.m will be dropped for GRASS 7. I think it is ok to+1
> mandate Python for GRASS 7 but we should keep it optional for GRASS 6.
> .... So what language to write g.gui in?
> Both /bin/sh + .bat versions depending on platform via Makefile magic?
> Do it in C?Not sure, I wrote draft in C
I summarized the issues on wiki
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/WxPython-based_GUI_for_GRASS#Issues
Martin
--
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *