I have noticed that if I have a vector that has categories in layer 2
and no cats in layer 1, d.vect by default doesn't display any of the
features, unless I specify layer=2 explicitely.
Try this - create a vector 'map' without categories in any layer.
Display it - you see it, OK. Now add categories into layer 2 only:
I have noticed that if I have a vector that has categories in layer 2
and no cats in layer 1, d.vect by default doesn't display any of the
features, unless I specify layer=2 explicitely.
Try this - create a vector 'map' without categories in any layer.
Display it - you see it, OK. Now add categories into layer 2 only:
I have noticed that if I have a vector that has categories in layer 2
and no cats in layer 1, d.vect by default doesn't display any of the
features, unless I specify layer=2 explicitely.
Try this - create a vector 'map' without categories in any layer.
Display it - you see it, OK. Now add categories into layer 2 only:
I have noticed that if I have a vector that has categories in layer 2
and no cats in layer 1, d.vect by default doesn't display any of the
features, unless I specify layer=2 explicitely.
Try this - create a vector 'map' without categories in any layer.
Display it - you see it, OK. Now add categories into layer 2 only:
d.vect --help
..
Parameters:
..
layer Layer number. If -1, all layers are displayed.
default: 1
seems clear to me.
are you asking that "-1" be the default?
I would vote against that: I think that layers are already complicated to understand, and are mostly used by power users who can use layer=-1 when they know what they are doing. Making this the default would be the road to even more potential confusion IMHO.