Datum: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:00:44 +0400
Von: Elvis Dowson <elvis.dowson@mac.com>
An: GRASS User <grass-user@lists.osgeo.org>
CC: "Sören Gebbert" <soerengebbert@gmx.de>
Betreff: Re: How to work with the NASA Blue Marble dataset
Hi,
I'd also like to know the difference between the data sets
provided in these two links
Visible Earth: Earth - The Blue Marble
Visible Earth: January, Blue Marble Next Generation w/ Topography and
Bathymetry
Datum: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:40:14 +0400
Von: Elvis Dowson <elvis.dowson@mac.com>
An: GRASS User <grass-user@lists.osgeo.org>
CC: "Sören Gebbert" <soerengebbert@gmx.de>
Betreff: How to work with the NASA Blue Marble dataset
Hi,
I'm new to GRASS and would like to know how I can work with
the NASA Blue Marble dataset.
No. The first one is a wms server which provides more data than just blue marble: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Map_Service
The second one is a ftp server providing blue marble image files.
Any tips on how I can get this into grass-6.4.0? Which modules should I use, should I use the r.in.onearth ? What sort of reprojection or processing should I do to get this into grass-6.4.0?
Best regards,
Elvis Dowson
On Sep 29, 2008, at 11:07 PM, Sören Gebbert wrote:
Hi Soren,
I just downloaded a file called world.topo.bathy.200412.3x5400x2700.jpg It’s a small one.
What should I do next? The description file for the r.in.onearth module give an example, but I’m not sure how to adapt it for this jpeg image and display it using grass.
EXAMPLEDownload Landsat Global Mosaik for Spearfish (SD, USA) area:
Hi Elvis,
please read the documentation of r.in.onearth carefully.
You dont need to download any data by hand from the wms server.
Please read the wikipedia doc about wms.
You need to start r.in.onearth within a grass session.
Starting the scrript in the commandline for blue marbel images (set the resolution to 500m
of the current location) of june:
Please read the documentation of grass, nasa and so on carefully.
Best regards
Soeren
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:45:47 +0400
Von: Elvis Dowson <elvis.dowson@mac.com>
An: "Sören Gebbert" <soerengebbert@gmx.de>
CC: grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
Betreff: Re: How to work with the NASA Blue Marble dataset
Hi Soren,
I just downloaded a file called world.topo.bathy.
200412.3x5400x2700.jpg It's a small one.
What should I do next? The description file for the r.in.onearth
module give an example, but I'm not sure how to adapt it for this jpeg
image and display it using grass.
EXAMPLE
Download Landsat Global Mosaik for Spearfish (SD, USA) area:
g.region res=15 -pa
r.in.onearth -l output=spearfish tmband=visual
d.rgb b=spearfish_LandsatTM_visual.blue
g=spearfish_LandsatTM_visual.green r=spearfish_LandsatTM_visual.red
Best regards,
Elvis Dowson
Hi Soren,
Is there a way to use already downloaded data?
I'll read the docs that you have suggested! Thanks!
Best regards,
Elvis Dowson
On Sep 30, 2008, at 12:12 AM, Sören Gebbert wrote:
Hi Elvis,
please read the documentation of r.in.onearth carefully.
You dont need to download any data by hand from the wms server.
Please read the wikipedia doc about wms.
You need to start r.in.onearth within a grass session.
Starting the scrript in the commandline for blue marbel images (set the resolution to 500m
of the current location) of june:
From what I've learnt there are three types of data, with the one
with the topography and bathymetry being the nicest looking.
I think the latest image set is the december next generation one found
here: Visible Earth: December, Blue Marble Next Generation
w/ Topography and Bathymetry
well, technically the Dec 2004 image IS the most recent, but the idea of Jan-Dec is to show variation in ice cover and vegetation throughout the year -- not that they gave up after a year of making marbles.
Any tips on how I can get this into grass-6.4.0? Which modules should
I use, should I use the r.in.onearth ? What sort of reprojection or
processing should I do to get this into grass-6.4.0?
feel free to improve. I've only downloaded the 2002 version + "Earth at
Night" image, so 2004 next-generation info is a bit thin. But I think you can adjust the 2002 method to suit.