o the high peak has northern, eastern and southern oriented steep slopes
o the more red, the higher beam irradiance calculated by the r.sun command above
o the southern oriented footslopes show a high beam irradiance (as exptected)
o the southern oriented and very steep slopes around the peak show a similar low beam irradiance as the northern slopes (not expected)
I have issues to interpret the results, especially the last pattern:
o Could be the lower beam irradiance in the very southern oriented slopes nearby the peak due to the very steep slope?
o Do slopes with a high inclination (though southern oriented) reduce beam irradiance in the implemented model?
o the high peak has northern, eastern and southern oriented steep slopes
o the more red, the higher beam irradiance calculated by the r.sun command above
o the southern oriented footslopes show a high beam irradiance (as exptected)
o the southern oriented and very steep slopes around the peak show a similar low beam irradiance as the northern slopes (not expected)
I have issues to interpret the results, especially the last pattern:
o Could be the lower beam irradiance in the very southern oriented slopes nearby the peak due to the very steep slope?
o Do slopes with a high inclination (though southern oriented) reduce beam irradiance in the implemented model?
*patched r.sun*
r.sun elevation=laser_dgm@data aspect=laser_dgm_aspect@data slope=laser_dgm_slope@data horizon_basename=horangle horizon_step=30 beam_rad=beam_rad_166 day=166
Number of threads <1>
Mode 2: integrated daily irradiation for a given day of the year
Using Linke constant: 3.000000
Using albedo constant: 0.200000
Using slope map <laser_dgm_slope@data>
Using aspect map <laser_dgm_aspect@data>
*slope zoomed only 50-90 degrees on the high altitudinal south oriented mountain face with a high slope gradient and high local geomorphological variability
