Jay,
At least as of 2022, the State of North Carolina Board of Elections was using QGIS/PostGIS https://it.nc.gov/documents/gicc/gicc-elections20220223pdf/open This was also referenced by the State of North Carolina GICC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) 's overview of GIS software and comparison of functionality between QGIS, ArcGIS , and GRASS GIS , https://it.nc.gov/open-gis-software-guide-understanding-current-gis-software-solutions/download?attachment QGIS and GRASS have gotten much better since then ( 2017).
Census Bureau GUPS https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/bas/technical-documentation/gups-instructions.html , which was just a customized version of QGIS provided nationwide for municipalities who could not afford ESRI software to digitize their updated boundaries for submission to the Census. They were moving to a web-based system, https://youtu.be/2OuVNNoeahY?list=PLXButqX2YO4JNhYweleaZBcwjFvDgqcpC , but who knows where that is now.
A presentation by a land manager in a town in a remote area of Canada from FOSS4GNA 2023 on why they chose QGIS , https://youtu.be/QwwQ-IWLmcQ?list=PLXButqX2YO4IVFL6fZ498DL0gY5z4hU6P .
Sure, it’s easy to set up AGOL, but start down the road of actually quantitatively using the data to answer questions and things get more complicated and more expensive quickly. If your supervisors are saying you need support, you need to quantify what they mean by support.
If your supervisors are thinking of live phone call hand holding support where a software fix can be done and delivered in 24 hours or live fixing of the software while you are on the phone, that is probably a higher level of support than is in the price quoted by ESRI for a basic license. It’s also not possible the way ESRI ( or any commercial vendor) rolls out patches. Be specific about what level of support you get for the price quoted.
If web maps are required, Felt, https://felt.com/ , and GeoCat, https://geocat.github.io/qgis-bridge-plugin/v4.1/index.html are commercial vendors that can publish your maps directly to the web from QGIS . Compare pricing and functionality. At least Felt lets you try it for free first.
I hope this helps,
Doug
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:29 PM Jay via OSGeo Discourse <noreply@discourse.osgeo.org> wrote:
I am looking for any and all examples I can find of government organizations (local, state, federal) that use open source platforms for operations or projects. I’m interested in other organizations too that work with QGIS, PostgreSQL, PostGIS if anything other than gov organizations comes to mind.
I work at a district health department, Environmental Health Section, and have been developing GIS for our department using QGIS and PostGIS. I currently have a robust QGIS project with which to collect GNSS data for our “site features” GeoPackage which includes all site features and attributes for site plans and permitting.
This QGIS project is ready to deploy as soon as it’s approved to purchase GNSS receivers. The PostGIS dev is a work in progress. The PostGIS I’m working on has a consistent schema to our existing DB for interoperability.
The site_features.gpkg used with my QGIS project is already developed with normalization dropdowns, constraints, uuid, timestamps, relations, photo and file fields, site plan templates, dynamic attribute forms etc. I’ve been using it in the field collecting data and it works great.
However, when it came to budget meetings recently, leadership is expressing hesitation in moving forward with an open source platform. “You get what you pay for.” “Commercial software (ESRI) has support that you don’t have with open source.”(We do). “Every other county health department is using ESRI and there are none using QGIS.”
So I have a meeting tomorrow afternoon that I have been preparing for in which leadership expects me to compare the 2 pathways forward. They want me to provide examples of other organizations using open source platforms…among other things.
Visit Topic or reply to this email to respond.
To unsubscribe from these emails, click here.