On 06/04/13 17:41, Hamish wrote:
oing back to the
osgeo web page overview for GRASS, it is likely
last edited some years ago, but it's all still
relevant. So "last edited ~2009" would look abandoned
but in this case unjustly, & so better to say nothing
about it at all?
I agree with Hamish, better to say nothing in the overview about last edited date. The more relevant date is "last time it was reviewed". For the moment, I vote that we don't include such a date as I don't see a strong call for it or need for it yet, and potential downside of confusing people.
--
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
http://www.lisasoft.com