Hi all,
I have a bunch of ideas bouncing around in my head and thought I would write them done and share them. I'm hoping to get feedback on these and if anyone has an interest in collaborating on these I would like that also. RFC101 is the bigger ticket item that could use C++ developer support or potentially funding support.
RFC101 needs to be thought out in more detail but it is a start of an idea.
RFC102 is more about me thinking through a problem before I start doing some work on it.
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/wiki/RFC101:-Adding-Support-for-HwyHierarchies-to-pgRouting
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/wiki/RFC102:-TSP-and-Generating-paths
Best regards,
-Steve
Hi Steve,
I just want to let you know that both RFC’s are headed to something I’m looking for.
I’m also following your progress understanding how OSRM works so maybe I can help somehow down the road (e.g., development, funding, not sure yet). 
···
–
Helder Alves
+351912384076
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri@swoodbridge.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I have a bunch of ideas bouncing around in my head and thought I would write them done and share them. I’m hoping to get feedback on these and if anyone has an interest in collaborating on these I would like that also. RFC101 is the bigger ticket item that could use C++ developer support or potentially funding support.
RFC101 needs to be thought out in more detail but it is a start of an idea.
RFC102 is more about me thinking through a problem before I start doing some work on it.
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/wiki/RFC101:-Adding-Support-for-HwyHierarchies-to-pgRouting
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/wiki/RFC102:-TSP-and-Generating-paths
Best regards,
-Steve
pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev