[pgrouting-users] Get organized and building our community

Hi all,

The recent up tick in list activity, code development, and interest that people have expressed toward getting involved is very exciting and has made be realize the we need more organization and some kind of plan on how to move forward. The PSC discussed this about a year ago, but we never got any critical mass and we had only one developer at the time that has since left to work on other projects.

I happen to be on the Mapserver PSC and this is an excellent model for us to follow. I will will look at taking the Mapserver PSC process and see about editing that to be appropriate for pgRouting and circulate it for comment and eventually a vote.

We already have a lot of documentation, wiki, git source respository, bug tracking in place.

Daniel - When you have a chance please post a summary with links to the various assets.

The areas where we need work (in no particular order) are:

o test suite and automated testing (I recommend we look at what postGIS is using)

o we have 2-4 part-time developers that are interest in work, so coordination these efforts will be key.

o we have bugs and issues that need to be tracked down and fixed

o we need to review and rewrite the plpgsql wrappers to be schema aware and standardize the APIs

o we can always use more examples, and tutorials and the existing examples and tutorials may need to be updated to the newer versions of postgresql, postgis, and pgrouting

o and we really need to look into make a new release.

o I would like to get our documentation into something like restructured text and under version control so it is easy update the website and maintain documentation as it is reflected in the code

o if there are people that are interested in translating documentation to local languages then we can look into setting up a way to manage that also.

o I'm sure there are other things, so please add them to the list and I will summarize them on a wiki page.

A lot of this stuff is researching and setting up a system and infrastructure to support it. After that we need to maintain it as we make changes to the code, but this should be minimal incremental effort once the infrastructure is in place.

If you want to contribute, please let us know. In the meanwhile, we will try to move forward with this. I know both Daniel and I are busy working on the jobs that pay the bills, but I think we can both find enough time to get some of this organized and support anyone that has some time to contribute.

Best regards,
   -Steve

Hi Steve,

Give me some more time to answer your email in detail. I won’t forget about it.
Well, I also hope to hear opinions and comments from others.

I would actually like to know, who of the current PSC is still following pgRouting:
http://www.pgrouting.org/development.html#project-steering-committe

I think it’s important that we have at least active PSC members.
Active doesn’t have to mean writing source code of course. Just a comment on the list from time to time, and maybe an answer to this email would be great :wink:

Daniel

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri@swoodbridge.com> wrote:

Hi all,

The recent up tick in list activity, code development, and interest that people have expressed toward getting involved is very exciting and has made be realize the we need more organization and some kind of plan on how to move forward. The PSC discussed this about a year ago, but we never got any critical mass and we had only one developer at the time that has since left to work on other projects.

I happen to be on the Mapserver PSC and this is an excellent model for us to follow. I will will look at taking the Mapserver PSC process and see about editing that to be appropriate for pgRouting and circulate it for comment and eventually a vote.

We already have a lot of documentation, wiki, git source respository, bug tracking in place.

Daniel - When you have a chance please post a summary with links to the various assets.

The areas where we need work (in no particular order) are:

o test suite and automated testing (I recommend we look at what postGIS is using)

o we have 2-4 part-time developers that are interest in work, so coordination these efforts will be key.

o we have bugs and issues that need to be tracked down and fixed

o we need to review and rewrite the plpgsql wrappers to be schema aware and standardize the APIs

o we can always use more examples, and tutorials and the existing examples and tutorials may need to be updated to the newer versions of postgresql, postgis, and pgrouting

o and we really need to look into make a new release.

o I would like to get our documentation into something like restructured text and under version control so it is easy update the website and maintain documentation as it is reflected in the code

o if there are people that are interested in translating documentation to local languages then we can look into setting up a way to manage that also.

o I’m sure there are other things, so please add them to the list and I will summarize them on a wiki page.

A lot of this stuff is researching and setting up a system and infrastructure to support it. After that we need to maintain it as we make changes to the code, but this should be minimal incremental effort once the infrastructure is in place.

If you want to contribute, please let us know. In the meanwhile, we will try to move forward with this. I know both Daniel and I are busy working on the jobs that pay the bills, but I think we can both find enough time to get some of this organized and support anyone that has some time to contribute.

Best regards,
-Steve


pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev


Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl@georepublic.de
Web: http://georepublic.de

Hi PSC,

This is a role call!
Who is still on the list?
Are you still interested in being involved?

Since Anton has moved on and said he will no longer be working on pgRouting, I take this as a resignation form the PSC also. This means we need to elect an chair for the PSC.

Daniel, I thought you were on the PSC!

-Steve

On 2/4/2012 12:27 AM, Daniel Kastl wrote:

Hi Steve,

Give me some more time to answer your email in detail. I won't forget
about it.
Well, I also hope to hear opinions and comments from others.

I would actually like to know, who of the current PSC is still following
pgRouting:
http://www.pgrouting.org/development.html#project-steering-committe

I think it's important that we have at least active PSC members.
Active doesn't have to mean writing source code of course. Just a
comment on the list from time to time, and maybe an answer to this email
would be great :wink:

Daniel

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
<woodbri@swoodbridge.com <mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge.com>> wrote:

    Hi all,

    The recent up tick in list activity, code development, and interest
    that people have expressed toward getting involved is very exciting
    and has made be realize the we need more organization and some kind
    of plan on how to move forward. The PSC discussed this about a year
    ago, but we never got any critical mass and we had only one
    developer at the time that has since left to work on other projects.

    I happen to be on the Mapserver PSC and this is an excellent model
    for us to follow. I will will look at taking the Mapserver PSC
    process and see about editing that to be appropriate for pgRouting
    and circulate it for comment and eventually a vote.

    We already have a lot of documentation, wiki, git source
    respository, bug tracking in place.

    Daniel - When you have a chance please post a summary with links to
    the various assets.

    The areas where we need work (in no particular order) are:

    o test suite and automated testing (I recommend we look at what
    postGIS is using)

    o we have 2-4 part-time developers that are interest in work, so
    coordination these efforts will be key.

    o we have bugs and issues that need to be tracked down and fixed

    o we need to review and rewrite the plpgsql wrappers to be schema
    aware and standardize the APIs

    o we can always use more examples, and tutorials and the existing
    examples and tutorials may need to be updated to the newer versions
    of postgresql, postgis, and pgrouting

    o and we really need to look into make a new release.

    o I would like to get our documentation into something like
    restructured text and under version control so it is easy update the
    website and maintain documentation as it is reflected in the code

    o if there are people that are interested in translating
    documentation to local languages then we can look into setting up a
    way to manage that also.

    o I'm sure there are other things, so please add them to the list
    and I will summarize them on a wiki page.

    A lot of this stuff is researching and setting up a system and
    infrastructure to support it. After that we need to maintain it as
    we make changes to the code, but this should be minimal incremental
    effort once the infrastructure is in place.

    If you want to contribute, please let us know. In the meanwhile, we
    will try to move forward with this. I know both Daniel and I are
    busy working on the jobs that pay the bills, but I think we can both
    find enough time to get some of this organized and support anyone
    that has some time to contribute.

    Best regards,
      -Steve
    ______________________________ _________________
    pgrouting-dev mailing list
    pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
    http://lists.osgeo.org/ mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev&gt;

--
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl@georepublic.de <mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de>
Web: http://georepublic.de/&gt;

_______________________________________________
pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev

Hi all,

I am not sure if this call was for interested people outside the PSC, but I would like to be involved in the planning and other tasks. So, you can count me in :slight_smile:

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri@swoodbridge.com> wrote:

Hi PSC,

This is a role call!
Who is still on the list?
Are you still interested in being involved?

Since Anton has moved on and said he will no longer be working on pgRouting, I take this as a resignation form the PSC also. This means we need to elect an chair for the PSC.

Daniel, I thought you were on the PSC!

-Steve

On 2/4/2012 12:27 AM, Daniel Kastl wrote:

Hi Steve,

Give me some more time to answer your email in detail. I won’t forget
about it.
Well, I also hope to hear opinions and comments from others.

I would actually like to know, who of the current PSC is still following
pgRouting:
http://www.pgrouting.org/development.html#project-steering-committe

I think it’s important that we have at least active PSC members.
Active doesn’t have to mean writing source code of course. Just a
comment on the list from time to time, and maybe an answer to this email
would be great :wink:

Daniel

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Woodbridge

<woodbri@swoodbridge.com mailto:[woodbri@swoodbridge.com](mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge.com)> wrote:

Hi all,

The recent up tick in list activity, code development, and interest
that people have expressed toward getting involved is very exciting
and has made be realize the we need more organization and some kind
of plan on how to move forward. The PSC discussed this about a year
ago, but we never got any critical mass and we had only one
developer at the time that has since left to work on other projects.

I happen to be on the Mapserver PSC and this is an excellent model
for us to follow. I will will look at taking the Mapserver PSC
process and see about editing that to be appropriate for pgRouting
and circulate it for comment and eventually a vote.

We already have a lot of documentation, wiki, git source
respository, bug tracking in place.

Daniel - When you have a chance please post a summary with links to
the various assets.

The areas where we need work (in no particular order) are:

o test suite and automated testing (I recommend we look at what
postGIS is using)

o we have 2-4 part-time developers that are interest in work, so
coordination these efforts will be key.

o we have bugs and issues that need to be tracked down and fixed

o we need to review and rewrite the plpgsql wrappers to be schema
aware and standardize the APIs

o we can always use more examples, and tutorials and the existing
examples and tutorials may need to be updated to the newer versions
of postgresql, postgis, and pgrouting

o and we really need to look into make a new release.

o I would like to get our documentation into something like
restructured text and under version control so it is easy update the
website and maintain documentation as it is reflected in the code

o if there are people that are interested in translating
documentation to local languages then we can look into setting up a
way to manage that also.

o I’m sure there are other things, so please add them to the list
and I will summarize them on a wiki page.

A lot of this stuff is researching and setting up a system and
infrastructure to support it. After that we need to maintain it as
we make changes to the code, but this should be minimal incremental
effort once the infrastructure is in place.

If you want to contribute, please let us know. In the meanwhile, we
will try to move forward with this. I know both Daniel and I are
busy working on the jobs that pay the bills, but I think we can both
find enough time to get some of this organized and support anyone
that has some time to contribute.

Best regards,
-Steve


pgrouting-dev mailing list

pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org mailto:[pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org](mailto:pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org)
http://lists.osgeo.org/ mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev

<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev>


Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan

eMail: daniel.kastl@georepublic.de mailto:[daniel.kastl@georepublic.de](mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de)
Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>


pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev


pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev


Regards,
-Jay Mahadeokar

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Jay Mahadeokar <jai.mahadeokar@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I am not sure if this call was for interested people outside the PSC, but I would like to be involved in the planning and other tasks. So, you can count me in :slight_smile:

Yes, this can be also seen as a call for interested people. So I’m glad to hear from you, Jay!

Daniel

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri@swoodbridge.com> wrote:

Hi PSC,

This is a role call!
Who is still on the list?
Are you still interested in being involved?

Since Anton has moved on and said he will no longer be working on pgRouting, I take this as a resignation form the PSC also. This means we need to elect an chair for the PSC.

Daniel, I thought you were on the PSC!

-Steve

On 2/4/2012 12:27 AM, Daniel Kastl wrote:

Hi Steve,

Give me some more time to answer your email in detail. I won’t forget
about it.
Well, I also hope to hear opinions and comments from others.

I would actually like to know, who of the current PSC is still following
pgRouting:
http://www.pgrouting.org/development.html#project-steering-committe

I think it’s important that we have at least active PSC members.
Active doesn’t have to mean writing source code of course. Just a
comment on the list from time to time, and maybe an answer to this email
would be great :wink:

Daniel

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Woodbridge

<woodbri@swoodbridge.com mailto:[woodbri@swoodbridge.com](mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge.com)> wrote:

Hi all,

The recent up tick in list activity, code development, and interest
that people have expressed toward getting involved is very exciting
and has made be realize the we need more organization and some kind
of plan on how to move forward. The PSC discussed this about a year
ago, but we never got any critical mass and we had only one
developer at the time that has since left to work on other projects.

I happen to be on the Mapserver PSC and this is an excellent model
for us to follow. I will will look at taking the Mapserver PSC
process and see about editing that to be appropriate for pgRouting
and circulate it for comment and eventually a vote.

We already have a lot of documentation, wiki, git source
respository, bug tracking in place.

Daniel - When you have a chance please post a summary with links to
the various assets.

The areas where we need work (in no particular order) are:

o test suite and automated testing (I recommend we look at what
postGIS is using)

o we have 2-4 part-time developers that are interest in work, so
coordination these efforts will be key.

o we have bugs and issues that need to be tracked down and fixed

o we need to review and rewrite the plpgsql wrappers to be schema
aware and standardize the APIs

o we can always use more examples, and tutorials and the existing
examples and tutorials may need to be updated to the newer versions
of postgresql, postgis, and pgrouting

o and we really need to look into make a new release.

o I would like to get our documentation into something like
restructured text and under version control so it is easy update the
website and maintain documentation as it is reflected in the code

o if there are people that are interested in translating
documentation to local languages then we can look into setting up a
way to manage that also.

o I’m sure there are other things, so please add them to the list
and I will summarize them on a wiki page.

A lot of this stuff is researching and setting up a system and
infrastructure to support it. After that we need to maintain it as
we make changes to the code, but this should be minimal incremental
effort once the infrastructure is in place.

If you want to contribute, please let us know. In the meanwhile, we
will try to move forward with this. I know both Daniel and I are
busy working on the jobs that pay the bills, but I think we can both
find enough time to get some of this organized and support anyone
that has some time to contribute.

Best regards,
-Steve


pgrouting-dev mailing list

pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org mailto:[pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org](mailto:pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org)
http://lists.osgeo.org/ mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev

<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev>


Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan

eMail: daniel.kastl@georepublic.de mailto:[daniel.kastl@georepublic.de](mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de)
Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>


pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev


pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev


Regards,
-Jay Mahadeokar


pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev


Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl@georepublic.de
Web: http://georepublic.de