The pgRouting team would like to announce:
pgRouting 2.1.0 RC3 Release
is ready for review and testing.
NEWS:
[https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWS](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWS)
Documentation:[](http://docs.pgrouting.org/)
[http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.html](http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.html)
Download & source:
[https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3)
develop:
[https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/develop](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/develop)
Closed Issues[](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+milestone:%22Release+2.1.0%22)
[https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Release+2.1.0%22+is%3Aclosed](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:issue+milestone:%22Release+2.1.0%22+is:closed)
We are very excited about this release and all the new features that are
being made available.
We hope the community will join in and support all the effort to get the
release this far with additional testing and feedback.
Best regards,
The pgRouting Team
On 08/31/2015 03:35 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
The pgRouting team would like to announce:
pgRouting 2.1.0 RC3 Release
is ready for review and testing.
NEWS:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWSDocumentation: <http://docs.pgrouting.org/>
http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.htmlDownload & source:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3develop:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/developClosed Issues <https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+milestone:"Release+2.1.0">
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A"Release+2.1.0"+is%3Aclosed <https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:issue+milestone:"Release+2.1.0"+is:closed>We are very excited about this release and all the new features that are
being made available.We hope the community will join in and support all the effort to get the
release this far with additional testing and feedback.Best regards,
The pgRouting Team
I tried a quick build in Fedora Rawhide and it succeeded.
Greetings,
Volker Fröhlich
Fedora
Volker:
Thanks for testing in fedora.
Can you tell me some details about the OS, so I can add it to the wiki.
Vicky.
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 00:25:14 +0200
From: volker27@gmx.at
To: pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [pgrouting-users] PgRouting 2.1.0 rc3 releaseOn 08/31/2015 03:35 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
The pgRouting team would like to announce:
pgRouting 2.1.0 RC3 Release
is ready for review and testing.
NEWS:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWSDocumentation: http://docs.pgrouting.org/
http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.htmlDownload & source:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3develop:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/developClosed Issues https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+milestone:"Release+2.1.0"
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A"Release+2.1.0"+is%3Aclosed https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:issue+milestone:"Release+2.1.0"+is:closedWe are very excited about this release and all the new features that are
being made available.We hope the community will join in and support all the effort to get the
release this far with additional testing and feedback.Best regards,
The pgRouting TeamI tried a quick build in Fedora Rawhide and it succeeded.
Greetings,
Volker Fröhlich
Fedora
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
Oh, there's not a lot to it. I'm the package maintainer and I just wanted to make sure it still builds at the top-of-development version of Fedora, called Rawhide. We are offering packages for quite a while already.
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/pgRouting
This was my scratch build environment:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6961/10946961/root.log
Note that this log will disappear as the scratch build is garbage-collected. I just received not of the final release. I'm going to package this now. I quickly read through the release notes of 2.1.0. I'm not sure, whether I should consider it an update to 2.0.0 I should ship or only build it in Rawhide and the upcoming Fedora 23. The goal is to not break existing installations.
Greetings,
Volker
On 09/04/2015 04:18 AM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
Volker:
Thanks for testing in fedora.
Can you tell me some details about the OS, so I can add it to the wiki.
Vicky.> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 00:25:14 +0200
> From: volker27@gmx.at
> To: pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [pgrouting-users] PgRouting 2.1.0 rc3 release
>
> On 08/31/2015 03:35 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
> >
> > The pgRouting team would like to announce:
> >
> > pgRouting 2.1.0 RC3 Release
> >
> > is ready for review and testing.
> >
> > NEWS:
> > https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWS
> >
> > Documentation: <http://docs.pgrouting.org/>
> > http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.html
> >
> > Download & source:
> > https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3
> >
> > develop:
> > https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/develop
> >
> > Closed Issues
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+milestone:"Release+2.1.0">
> >
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A"Release+2.1.0"+is%3Aclosed
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:issue+milestone:"Release+2.1.0"+is:closed>
> >
> > We are very excited about this release and all the new features
that are
> > being made available.
> >
> > We hope the community will join in and support all the effort to
get the
> > release this far with additional testing and feedback.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > The pgRouting Team
> >
>
> I tried a quick build in Fedora Rawhide and it succeeded.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Volker Fröhlich
> Fedora
> _______________________________________________
> Pgrouting-users mailing list
> Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users_______________________________________________
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
Volker,
pgRouting 2.1.0 has additional functions and features. A user can upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1.0, but for people who want just the same functionality they had before with bug fixes, they should be using 2.0.1.
So if it’s not a problem for you having both a 2.1.0 and a 2.0.1 package would be best. 2.0.1 really I think only has bug fixes that affected windows, so even that is not a big deal for other distros.
Also if you could add description about Fedora packages here – https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/wiki/Notes-on-Download%2C-Installation-and-building-pgRouting that would be swell.
Hope that helps,
Regina Obe
Windows PostGIS/pgRouting package maintainer
PostGIS and pgRouting development team member
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:45:03 +0200
From: volker27@gmx.at
To: pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [pgrouting-users] PgRouting 2.1.0 rc3 releaseOh, there’s not a lot to it. I’m the package maintainer and I just
wanted to make sure it still builds at the top-of-development version of
Fedora, called Rawhide. We are offering packages for quite a while already.https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/pgRouting
This was my scratch build environment:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6961/10946961/root.log
Note that this log will disappear as the scratch build is
garbage-collected. I just received not of the final release. I’m going
to package this now. I quickly read through the release notes of 2.1.0.
I’m not sure, whether I should consider it an update to 2.0.0 I should
ship or only build it in Rawhide and the upcoming Fedora 23. The goal is
to not break existing installations.Greetings,
Volker
On 09/04/2015 04:18 AM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
Volker:
Thanks for testing in fedora.
Can you tell me some details about the OS, so I can add it to the wiki.
Vicky.Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 00:25:14 +0200
From: volker27@gmx.at
To: pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [pgrouting-users] PgRouting 2.1.0 rc3 releaseOn 08/31/2015 03:35 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
The pgRouting team would like to announce:
pgRouting 2.1.0 RC3 Release
is ready for review and testing.
NEWS:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWSDocumentation: <http://docs.pgrouting.org/>
http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.htmlDownload & source:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3develop:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/developClosed Issues
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+milestone:%22Release+2.1.0%22>https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Release+2.1.0%22+is%3Aclosed
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:issue+milestone:%22Release+2.1.0%22+is:closed>We are very excited about this release and all the new features
that are
being made available.We hope the community will join in and support all the effort to
get the
release this far with additional testing and feedback.Best regards,
The pgRouting TeamI tried a quick build in Fedora Rawhide and it succeeded.
Greetings,
Volker Fröhlich
Fedora
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
Forgot to add. It’s not like the 1.0 to 2.0 changes where apis were broken.
The pgRouting 2.1.0 release still supports all the APIs of 2.0 but contains additional supporting bigints.
To go from 2.0.0 to 2.1.0, people will need to do an:
ALTER EXTENSION pgrouting UPDATE ;
though.
Or alternatively – this would be needed if you were running a 2.1.0 alpha/beta/rc or other unreleased version of pgRouting
DROP EXTENSION pgrouting;
CREATE EXTENSION pgrouting;
From: pgrouting-users-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:pgrouting-users-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paragon Corporation
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 6:58 PM
To: ‘pgRouting users mailing list’ pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [pgrouting-users] PgRouting 2.1.0 rc3 release
Volker,
pgRouting 2.1.0 has additional functions and features. A user can upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1.0, but for people who want just the same functionality they had before with bug fixes, they should be using 2.0.1.
So if it’s not a problem for you having both a 2.1.0 and a 2.0.1 package would be best. 2.0.1 really I think only has bug fixes that affected windows, so even that is not a big deal for other distros.
Also if you could add description about Fedora packages here – https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/wiki/Notes-on-Download%2C-Installation-and-building-pgRouting that would be swell.
Hope that helps,
Regina Obe
Windows PostGIS/pgRouting package maintainer
PostGIS and pgRouting development team member
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:45:03 +0200
From: volker27@gmx.at
To: pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [pgrouting-users] PgRouting 2.1.0 rc3 releaseOh, there’s not a lot to it. I’m the package maintainer and I just
wanted to make sure it still builds at the top-of-development version of
Fedora, called Rawhide. We are offering packages for quite a while already.https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/pgRouting
This was my scratch build environment:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6961/10946961/root.log
Note that this log will disappear as the scratch build is
garbage-collected. I just received not of the final release. I’m going
to package this now. I quickly read through the release notes of 2.1.0.
I’m not sure, whether I should consider it an update to 2.0.0 I should
ship or only build it in Rawhide and the upcoming Fedora 23. The goal is
to not break existing installations.Greetings,
Volker
On 09/04/2015 04:18 AM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
Volker:
Thanks for testing in fedora.
Can you tell me some details about the OS, so I can add it to the wiki.
Vicky.Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 00:25:14 +0200
From: volker27@gmx.at
To: pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [pgrouting-users] PgRouting 2.1.0 rc3 releaseOn 08/31/2015 03:35 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
The pgRouting team would like to announce:
pgRouting 2.1.0 RC3 Release
is ready for review and testing.
NEWS:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWSDocumentation: <http://docs.pgrouting.org/>
http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.htmlDownload & source:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3develop:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/developClosed Issues
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+milestone:%22Release+2.1.0%22>https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Release+2.1.0%22+is%3Aclosed
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:issue+milestone:%22Release+2.1.0%22+is:closed>We are very excited about this release and all the new features
that are
being made available.We hope the community will join in and support all the effort to
get the
release this far with additional testing and feedback.Best regards,
The pgRouting TeamI tried a quick build in Fedora Rawhide and it succeeded.
Greetings,
Volker Fröhlich
Fedora
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
Hi List
When building pg route
To enable the driving distance stuff your normally have to say
cmake -DWITH_DOC=ON -DWITH_DD=ON …
it came back with a diagnostic about WITH_DD not being used, but it still built it with the driving distance enabled.
The file tools/vagrant/build.sh still has the text ‘cmake -H. -Bbuild -DWITH_DD=ON’ in it
I am not complaining, just confused, I just need to know what to do.
I never did understand why it necessary to build pgroute from the source to include the driving distance!!
regards
Dave.
···
On 31/08/15 14:35, Vicky Vergara wrote:
The pgRouting team would like to announce: pgRouting 2.1.0 RC3 Release is ready for review and testing. NEWS: [https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWS](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWS) Documentation: [http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.html](http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.html) Download & source: [https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3) develop: [https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/develop](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/develop) Closed Issues [https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Release+2.1.0%22+is%3Aclosed](https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:issue+milestone:%22Release+2.1.0%22+is:closed) We are very excited about this release and all the new features that are being made available. We hope the community will join in and support all the effort to get the release this far with additional testing and feedback. Best regards, The pgRouting Team_______________________________________________ pgrouting-dev mailing list [pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org](mailto:pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org) [http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev](http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev)
Hi Dave,
When we released pgrouting 2.0 the CGAL library was not available for all platforms and you had to build that from source so we make DD optional in case CGAL was not available.
Now CGAL is required for postGIS and is generally more available on all platforms, so on 2.1, we now always build DD into pgrouting and the -DWITH_DD=ON option is totally ignored.
-Steve
On 9/19/2015 3:16 AM, Dave Potts wrote:
Hi List
When building pg route
To enable the driving distance stuff your normally have to say
cmake -DWITH_DOC=ON -DWITH_DD=ON ..
it came back with a diagnostic about WITH_DD not being used, but it
still built it with the driving distance enabled.The file tools/vagrant/build.sh still has the text 'cmake -H. -Bbuild
-DWITH_DD=ON' in itI am not complaining, just confused, I just need to know what to do.
I never did understand why it necessary to build pgroute from the source
to include the driving distance!!regards
Dave.
On 31/08/15 14:35, Vicky Vergara wrote:
The pgRouting team would like to announce:
pgRouting 2.1.0 RC3 Release
is ready for review and testing.
NEWS:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/blob/develop/NEWSDocumentation:
http://docs.pgrouting.org/v2.1.0-rc3/doc/index.htmlDownload & source:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/releases/tag/pgrouting-2.1.0-rc3develop:
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/tree/developClosed Issues
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A"Release+2.1.0"+is%3Aclosed
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues?q=is:issue+milestone:"Release+2.1.0"+is:closed>We are very excited about this release and all the new features that are
being made available.We hope the community will join in and support all the effort to get the
release this far with additional testing and feedback.Best regards,
The pgRouting Team_______________________________________________
pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev_______________________________________________
pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev