Ok, this makes some sense. I would like us to try and set some minimum requirements for the contrib submissions. Like when a file(s) is contributed it gets a named like:
<whatever>-cod.sql - example code
<whatever>-doc.txt - file with some minimum doc in it
<whatever>-dat.sql - sample data in pg_dump -fP format compressed with gzip
We can relax these on a case by case basis after the PSC has had a chance to review potential submissions. This is less to raise a barrier and more to set some quality standards for pgRouting. People can always post code in blogs and private git repositories, etc without meeting these standards. Also if pgRouting changes in some way and the examples not longer work and no one is interested in updating them, then they should be removed.
Hi Steve,
I fully agree. Well, the idea of the pgrouting-contrib repository is to
collect stuff like that: wrapper examples, scripts like the one to
create a pgRouting database template, etc..
The purpose of this repository is not to provide widely tested and
perfect wrappers. But as Worth said, it can be of great help to have
some examples if you want to write your first own wrapper function. And
it's not a good idea to put too many wrapper functions into core
library. There are already too many.
So I think it's better to publish "unfinished" and custom code samples,
because that still helps users more than no examples at all, right? ![:wink: :wink:](/images/emoji/twitter/wink.png?v=12)
In the worst case it's just there and can be taken as a reference to
answer questions in the mailing list, in the best case someone
contributes feedback or even improvements.
Unfortunately it pgrouting-contrib has never grown beyond the one
wrapper and a few other things. Probably it wasn't explained clear
enough that everyone is welcome to add their examples there. Or it's too
difficult to contribute.
Daniel
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Stephen Woodbridge
<woodbri@swoodbridge.com <mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge.com>> wrote:
Hi Worth and all,
Thanks for the offer but no need for that now.
My main concern was that looking at it, it does not seem that we
want to make it a part of the core functionality for a few reasons:
o it is not documented
o as pointed out it is not generalized and has some assumptions
o a lot of the code could be simplified and made more efficient nor
is it the best example, although I'm sure it did the job that was
needed at the time
o our experience has been that wrappers that get release as examples
tend to get used as the "main" API to pgrouting and therefore need
to be clear, easy to follow and well documented.
Having said that, we need some nice wrappers. I have written my own
wrappers, but alas they also suffer from many of the same ills, I
mentioned because I wrote them for my own use/reuse and not for the
general public. If I can find some time it is on my list of things
to do for pgrouting.
Thanks,
-Steve
On 12/4/2011 6:35 PM, Worth Lutz wrote:
As Daniel noted, the function will not work with all types of data.
I cannot remember now but I had to change something in it to make it
work with my data. I could diff against the original and tell
you what
if anyone is interested.
It is a great example though. It taught me how to use pl/pgsql
to solve
problems I was having.
Worth Lutz
*From: * pgrouting-users-bounces@lists. osgeo.org
<mailto:pgrouting-users-bounces@lists.osgeo.org>
[mailto:pgrouting-users- bounces@lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:pgrouting-users-bounces@lists.osgeo.org>] *On Behalf Of
*Daniel Kastl
*Sent:* Sunday, December 04, 2011 10:39 AM
*To:* pgRouting users mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [pgrouting-users] routing_core_smart problem
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Stephen Woodbridge
<woodbri@swoodbridge.com <mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge.com>
<mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge. com
<mailto:woodbri@swoodbridge.com>>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Who wrote the routing_core_smart.sql functions?
Anton
Is there any documentation of them? It would be nice if we had:
Right ... would be nice to have ![:wink: :wink:](/images/emoji/twitter/wink.png?v=12)
I actually just decided to publish the wrapper, because there were
several questions in the past how the pgRouting demo could start the
route from/to the point you clicked.
1. description of the major public entry points and what the
arguments should be.
It even needs an extra table "network_statistics" to work.
But on the other hand it was supposed to be an example of
writing a more
complex wrapper function. It's not really a generic function and
may not
work with any type of data.
There are probably several possibilities to improve the functions.
Daniel
2. comments in the code that explain what the overview
strategy is
and/or a high level pseudocode of how it executes
Thanks,
-Steve
On 12/2/2011 9:57 PM, Daniel Kastl wrote:
Hi Lutz,
Thank you very much for sharing this information!
I have also created this ticket:
https://github.com/pgRouting/ pgrouting-contrib/issues/3
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting-contrib/issues/3>
So you're talking about the following two lines?
* Line 191
https://github.com/pgRouting/ pgrouting-contrib/blob/master/
wrapper/routing_core_smart. sql#L191
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting-contrib/blob/master/wrapper/routing_core_smart.sql#L191>
* Line 205
https://github.com/pgRouting/ pgrouting-contrib/blob/master/
wrapper/routing_core_smart. sql#L205
<https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting-contrib/blob/master/wrapper/routing_core_smart.sql#L205>
Best regards,
Daniel
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Worth Lutz
<wal3@mindspring.com <mailto:wal3@mindspring.com>
<mailto:wal3@mindspring.com>
<mailto:wal3@mindspring.com
<mailto:wal3@mindspring.com>>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have found what appears to be a problem in one of the
routing_core_smart functions.
In the function locate_point_as_geometry there are two
lines which
call the function geometryfromtext.
These functions are called when line_substring returns a
point.
In the geometryfromtext function calls, there is no
second argument
for the srid. This produces a geometry with a “-1” for
the srid.
When I use shootingstar_smart in my script, MapServer
fails on
trying to work with two geometries with different srids.
Adding the second argument to the geometryfromtext
function fixed
this problem. The only geometry with the “-1” srid was
the one
created by these function calls.
I hope this helps someone.
Worth Lutz
______________________________ _________________
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo. org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists. osgeo.org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>>
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists. osgeo.org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists. osgeo.org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>>>
http://lists.osgeo.org/ mailman/listinfo/pgrouting- users
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
--
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl@georepublic.de
<mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de>
<mailto:daniel.kastl@ georepublic.de
<mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de>>
<mailto:daniel.kastl@ georepublic.de
<mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de>
<mailto:daniel.kastl@ georepublic.de
<mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de>>>
Web: http://georepublic.de/>
______________________________ _________________
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo. org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists. osgeo.org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>>
http://lists.osgeo.org/ mailman/listinfo/pgrouting- users
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
______________________________ _________________
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo. org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists. osgeo.org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>>
http://lists.osgeo.org/ mailman/listinfo/pgrouting- users
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
--
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl@georepublic.de
<mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de> <mailto:daniel.kastl@
georepublic.de <mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de>>
Web: http://georepublic.de/>
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4656 - Release Date:
12/04/11
______________________________ _________________
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo. org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/ mailman/listinfo/pgrouting- users
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
______________________________ _________________
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo. org
<mailto:Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/ mailman/listinfo/pgrouting- users
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
--
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl@georepublic.de <mailto:daniel.kastl@georepublic.de>
Web: http://georepublic.de/>
_______________________________________________
Pgrouting-users mailing list
Pgrouting-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users