Would that really be faster, adding 60 r.out.gdal exports first? I'm
patching together Grass rasters, not image formats like tiff, etc. It seems
to me it would be better to keep the data in Grass raster format and just
mapcalc together (or patch, is there a difference?).
~ Eric.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maciek Sieczka
To: Patton, Eric
Cc: grassuser@grass.itc.it; grass-dev@grass.itc.it
Sent: 5/11/2006 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] More efficient to use r.mapcalc or r.patch in a l
oop for creating mosaics?
On Thu, 11 May 2006 16:11:35 -0300
"Patton, Eric" <epatton@nrcan.gc.ca> wrote:
Maciek,
My particular installation doesn't have gdal compiled with Grass
support (yet), so I need another work around, hence r.mapcalc/patch.
Hmm, then maybe r.out.gdal first (this takes only Grass to be built with
Gdal).
Maciek
--------------------
W polskim Internecie s? setki milion?w stron. My przekazujemy Tobie
tylko najlepsze z nich!
http://katalog.panoramainternetu.pl/