RE: [SAC] svn problem

Committees SAC mailing list
1

Hi,

Yes, the FDO repositories have been merged for the trunk but we still
need access to the 3.2.1 and 3.2.x branches.

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
Sent: February 14, 2007 9:25 AM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo
Subject: Re: [SAC] svn problem

Howard Butler wrote:

Have all of the FDO repositories been merged into a single one yet, or
is that something that is upcoming?

AFAIK, they have been merged:

http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/2007-February/000781.html

Cheers
--
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

2

I understand.
I also use 3.2.x and yesterday I did svn update without problems.
Here is the URL for confirmation:

https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdocore/branches/3.2.x

Mateusz

Jack Lee wrote:

Hi,

Yes, the FDO repositories have been merged for the trunk but we still
need access to the 3.2.1 and 3.2.x branches.

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
Sent: February 14, 2007 9:25 AM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo
Subject: Re: [SAC] svn problem

Howard Butler wrote:

Have all of the FDO repositories been merged into a single one yet, or
is that something that is upcoming?

AFAIK, they have been merged:

http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/2007-February/000781.html

Cheers

--
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net