RE: [SAC] svn problem

Just to clarify, we need continued access to the 3.2.1 and 3.2.x branches in the following repository locations for the indefinite future.

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdo32x

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdocore

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdoshp

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdosdf

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdowfs

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdowms

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdoarcsde

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdordbms

https://osgeo.org/svn/fdogdal

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jack Lee
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:35 AM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo
Subject: RE: [SAC] svn problem

Hi,

Yes, the FDO repositories have been merged for the trunk but we still

need access to the 3.2.1 and 3.2.x branches.

-----Original Message-----

From: sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org]

On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot

Sent: February 14, 2007 9:25 AM

To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo

Subject: Re: [SAC] svn problem

Howard Butler wrote:

Have all of the FDO repositories been merged into a single one yet, or

is that something that is upcoming?

AFAIK, they have been merged:

http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/2007-February/000781.html

Cheers

Mateusz Loskot

http://mateusz.loskot.net


Sac mailing list

Sac@lists.osgeo.org

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac


Sac mailing list

Sac@lists.osgeo.org

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac