RE: [Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] [Tc] OGC in Where 2.0 2007

Guess we’ll just have to come up with a sexier interop demo than them. :slight_smile:

Preferably with a full SDI. GeoNetwork + several WMS/WFS providers + several clients?

Can we come up with a compelling and realistic scenario?

Perhaps some individual proprietary vendors (Safe software - new spatial ETL server?) could be convinced to participate as data sources for interop?

Jason


From: viscom-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:viscom-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Michael P. Gerlek
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:29
To: Visibility Committee Discussion List
Subject: [Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] [Tc] OGC in Where 2.0 2007
Importance: Low

FYI, this is OGC’s thoughts on Where 2.0 – apparently they’re not interested in doing a collaborative demo thing with OSGeo, oh well.

I will try to ping Brady again today.

-mpg

If someone wanted to take point on such a thing, we would bring the full power of VisCom to bear in support.

That said, Brady (O’Reilly’s Where guy) seems to have gone silent on us… :frowning:

-mpg


From: viscom-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:viscom-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:23 PM
To: Visibility Committee Discussion List
Subject: RE: [Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] [Tc] OGC in Where 2.0 2007

Guess we’ll just have to come up with a sexier interop demo than them. :slight_smile:

Preferably with a full SDI. GeoNetwork + several WMS/WFS providers + several clients?

Can we come up with a compelling and realistic scenario?

Perhaps some individual proprietary vendors (Safe software - new spatial ETL server?) could be convinced to participate as data sources for interop?

Jason


From: viscom-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:viscom-dev-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Michael P. Gerlek
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:29
To: Visibility Committee Discussion List
Subject: [Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] [Tc] OGC in Where 2.0 2007
Importance: Low

FYI, this is OGC’s thoughts on Where 2.0 – apparently they’re not interested in doing a collaborative demo thing with OSGeo, oh well.

I will try to ping Brady again today.

-mpg