RE: [VisCom] Where 2.0 promotional opportunities

Committees Marketing
1

Free is good; I misunderstood what was being offered. I'm in favor of
this..

-mpg

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Moran [mailto:peter.moran@autodesk.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:09 PM
To: dev@visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
Cc: Gary Lang; cholmes@openplans.org
Subject: RE: [VisCom] Where 2.0 promotional opportunities

The placement is paid for. Degree of difficulty is low - all it would
take is to get the specs, and have a designer do some simple artwork
with the logo and tagline, and maybe some light animation. And
oreillynet.com seems to be an appropriate venue. So I suggest that we
use this item to promote OSGeo. We can discuss more here or during
tomorrow's meeting.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael P. Gerlek [mailto:mpg@lizardtech.com]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 1:09 PM
To: dev@visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
Cc: Gary Lang; cholmes@openplans.org
Subject: RE: [VisCom] Where 2.0 promotional opportunities

I wrote:

> >7. 20,000 online baler impressions on oreillynet.com
>
> 0, what is an "online baler impression"? And would I really
> need twenty thousand of them?

Google to the rescue: "Did you mean: online banner impression?"

Oh, duh, right...

I have no idea of the value of these things, being a lowly
engineer. If
we had to pay for it, I'd say probably not -- we could
presumably better
target that money to more geo-centric websites..?

-mpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org