RE: [Web Comm] Re: Migration planning meeting

Committees SAC mailing list
1

Hi all,

The research matrix is now up with all results.

http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Infrastructure_Transition_Plan#Provider_
Matrix

Our initial recommendation is to get quotes from these three:

- Hurricaine
- PEER1
- iWeb (?)

Does anyone have objections to any of these three? We need to be able
to accept the lowest quote from the three unless there is a strong
reason not to. Do we just want to get q quote from HE and see if it's
reasonable?

I'm gone for the day, but I'd like to wrap this up tomorrow.

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Tyler Mitchell [mailto:tylermitchell@shaw.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 07:48
To: dev@webcommittee.osgeo.org; Geoff Zeiss; sac@sac.osgeo.org; Robert
Bray
Subject: [Web Comm] Re: Migration planning meeting

FYI - call-in number:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Conference_Call

and meeting time:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/WebCom_Meeting_20061025

[For reference, that's 11am Pacific time.]

Talk to you then,
Tyler

-----Original Message-----
From: Tyler Mitchell (External)
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:33 PM
To: dev@webcommittee.osgeo.org; dev@webcommittee.osgeo.org
Cc: Geoff Zeiss; Robert Bray
Subject: Migration planning meeting

Hi all, can we plan to have a meeting on Wednesday to discuss
migration plans from webcom's perspective

Also, I would like to see if we can drag Geoff Zeiss and Bob Bray into

the meeting if possible, so they can talk about their commitment,
perspective and resources. We can use the voice conference call line.

Tyler

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@webcommittee.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@webcommittee.osgeo.org

2

Jason Birch wrote:

Hi all,

The research matrix is now up with all results.

http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Infrastructure_Transition_Plan#Provider_
Matrix

Our initial recommendation is to get quotes from these three:

- Hurricaine
- PEER1
- iWeb (?)

Does anyone have objections to any of these three? We need to be able
to accept the lowest quote from the three unless there is a strong
reason not to. Do we just want to get q quote from HE and see if it's
reasonable?

I'm gone for the day, but I'd like to wrap this up tomorrow.

Jason,

As much as I think the service level agreements are mostly a joke, it
seems we abandoned OSU OSL because it did not have one. To the best
of my knowledge iweb also does not offer service level agreements, so
I think we should leave it out. I would suggest adding in rack space
instead since they are highly regarded albeit with the understanding they
are unlikely to be very cost competative.

PS. I'd really like to encourage everyone involved to join the sac list.
These super cross posting results in very corrupted subject lines and
drive me crazy. IMHO webcom should primariliy be consulted for drupal
web site type discussions. And your (Jason) involvement in sac is enough
to ensure webcom infrastructure needs should be met.

Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org