In an effort to reduce the 'bus number' of the TileCache/FeatuereServer
projects, I'd like to migrate the project hosting to somewhere more
permanant; it seems to me that OSGeo hosting these projects would be an
ideal situation.
Aspects of the hosting that are relevant:
* SVN
* Homepage (very small number of hits)
* Domain Registration
* DNS
In the process, it would also be nice to have access to a trac instance
for each project.
These projects are small; they get a small number of hits, and I do not
anticipate that they would ever be large enough to warrant official incubation
into OSGeo.
I believe the thing to do is to motion that OSGeo host these projects,
with myself as the SAC member doing the work; I am +1 on the motion
for both TileCache and FeatureServer.
On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to reduce the 'bus number' of the TileCache/FeatuereServer
projects, I'd like to migrate the project hosting to somewhere more
permanant; it seems to me that OSGeo hosting these projects would be an
ideal situation.
Aspects of the hosting that are relevant:
* SVN
* Homepage (very small number of hits)
* Domain Registration
* DNS
On January 15, 2010 02:13:36 pm Christopher Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to reduce the 'bus number' of the TileCache/FeatuereServer
projects, I'd like to migrate the project hosting to somewhere more
permanant; it seems to me that OSGeo hosting these projects would be an
ideal situation.
Aspects of the hosting that are relevant:
* SVN
* Homepage (very small number of hits)
* Domain Registration
* DNS
In the process, it would also be nice to have access to a trac instance
for each project.
These projects are small; they get a small number of hits, and I do not
anticipate that they would ever be large enough to warrant official
incubation into OSGeo.
I believe the thing to do is to motion that OSGeo host these projects,
with myself as the SAC member doing the work; I am +1 on the motion
for both TileCache and FeatureServer.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 21:13, Christopher Schmidt
<crschmidt@metacarta.com> wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to reduce the 'bus number' of the TileCache/FeatuereServer
projects, I'd like to migrate the project hosting to somewhere more
permanant; it seems to me that OSGeo hosting these projects would be an
ideal situation.
Aspects of the hosting that are relevant:
* SVN
* Homepage (very small number of hits)
* Domain Registration
* DNS
In the process, it would also be nice to have access to a trac instance
for each project.
These projects are small; they get a small number of hits, and I do not
anticipate that they would ever be large enough to warrant official incubation
into OSGeo.
I believe the thing to do is to motion that OSGeo host these projects,
with myself as the SAC member doing the work; I am +1 on the motion
for both TileCache and FeatureServer.
Best Regards,
--
Christopher Schmidt
MetaCarta
_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:13:36PM -0500, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
I believe the thing to do is to motion that OSGeo host these projects,
with myself as the SAC member doing the work; I am +1 on the motion
for both TileCache and FeatureServer.
With the support of the majority of SAC, I'm going to consider this
passed.
On Feb 4, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:13:36PM -0500, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
I believe the thing to do is to motion that OSGeo host these projects,
with myself as the SAC member doing the work; I am +1 on the motion
for both TileCache and FeatureServer.
With the support of the majority of SAC, I'm going to consider this
passed.
Please forward this on to the board for them to not object for two days and start the work at your convenience
