[SAC] Migration and options

Hi all,

Anyone else been thinking about potentially changing our web hosting?

I've had some encouraging discussion with Lance from http://osuosl.org and I think we could make something really good work there. We did some test on their infrastructure a couple years back, but at the time we were more worried about performance guarantees then about bandwidth, scalability and performance, etc. and not really too worried about costs either. As it stands, we pay $13,200 per year for the two boxes - at least one of which likely needs some upgrades.

A couple things that the OSL seems to have going for it:

* affordability, reduced costs (power + cooling costs is all that's need, for example)
* flexibility - could donate our own hardware to be used, instead of paying a premium monthly fee
* managed/unmanaged options - admins with familiarity of much of our toolset, and they even use IRC too :slight_smile:
* online NAS backups
* access to a MySQL cluster

All this is not totally verified, but a bit more is here:
http://osuosl.org/hosting/services
http://osuosl.org/hosting

If the group is generally interested, I can continue my discussion with them and firm up on the costs side - or ask any particular questions you may have.

The solution works for many others, so perhaps it would be a fit for us too:
http://osuosl.org/hosting/clients

I'm in favour of looking into it more.

Tyler

On 19.08.2008 01:30, Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:

I'm in favour of looking into it more.

+1
I think it sounds promising. The current solution is starting to be more of a problem than a solution...

The clients listing is very impressive and lists many familiar names...

--Wolf

--

<:3 )---- Wolf Bergenheim ----( 8:>

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:30:37PM -0700, Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:

Anyone else been thinking about potentially changing our web hosting?

I recall Jason's response from last time "is PEER1 value for money"
came up: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2008-March/001224.html

I've had some encouraging discussion with Lance from http://
osuosl.org and I think we could make something really good work

The "blocking issue" (as on Jason's list) is that Mapguide/ADSK wanted
a Service Level Agreement and OSUOSL were unable to offer one because
they don't directly manage the network infrastructure, just the servers.

Is an SLA still important to Mapguide? Has OSUOSL's stance changed?
Also, do they have any mirroring arrangements with like-minded
European or Asian institutions?

cheers,

jo
--