[SAC] [MOTION] Grant sysadmin contract to Martin Spott

Committees SAC mailing list
1

This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours
of sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
for a total of 5000 EUR.

The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority order
and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings and
suggesting more actions as they are found useful.

Will start with my +1

--strk;

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:

> Martin: do you confirm you're up for the job ?

Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo to sell
50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly rate of
100 EUR

2

I'm in favor of the proposal. However we only have 11 tickets marked
higher than "normal", (not all are actually that hard of tasks). So I
think we need to clarify the main topics of interest, SSL and LDAP seem
to be 2 of the bigs things, followed by system configuration issues like
download disk space, retiring osgeo4, containers or virtualization on
osgeo6. We should also clarify if we want the hours to go as fast as
possible or have some expectation of a time window under which it will
be done.

Also should time spent on normal management and monitoring be excluded,
system updates, backups etc?

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/07/2017 01:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours
of sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
for a total of 5000 EUR.

The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority order
and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings and
suggesting more actions as they are found useful.

Will start with my +1

--strk;

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:

Martin: do you confirm you're up for the job ?

Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo to sell
50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly rate of
100 EUR

3

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

I'm in favor of the proposal. However we only have 11 tickets marked
higher than "normal", (not all are actually that hard of tasks). So I
think we need to clarify the main topics of interest, SSL and LDAP seem
to be 2 of the bigs things, followed by system configuration issues like
download disk space, retiring osgeo4, containers or virtualization on
osgeo6.

My idea is we'd all help setting those priorities in tickets, Martin
included (he would file tickets for proposals).
For sure SSL is a fundamental topic (it's preventing people from using
the services).

We should also clarify if we want the hours to go as fast as
possible or have some expectation of a time window under which it will
be done.

I would expect between 1 and 2 months of elapsed time to complete
the hours.

Also should time spent on normal management and monitoring be excluded,
system updates, backups etc?

I don't think so, why should them ? If any volunteer is already doing
this it can be announced on this list so the task is taken off Martin's
plate.

--strk;

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/07/2017 01:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours
> of sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
> for a total of 5000 EUR.
>
> The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority order
> and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings and
> suggesting more actions as they are found useful.
>
> Will start with my +1
>
> --strk;
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>>
>>> Martin: do you confirm you're up for the job ?
>>
>> Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo to sell
>> 50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly rate of
>> 100 EUR
_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

4

I'd like to put this vote on hold for a day or two until I can get a
report from the Treasurer making sure we actually have the amount for
this within our current budget. Hopefully I'll have those numbers before
the meeting tomorrow.

More responses below...inline.

On 11/07/2017 10:59 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

I'm in favor of the proposal. However we only have 11 tickets marked
higher than "normal", (not all are actually that hard of tasks). So I
think we need to clarify the main topics of interest, SSL and LDAP seem
to be 2 of the bigs things, followed by system configuration issues like
download disk space, retiring osgeo4, containers or virtualization on
osgeo6.

My idea is we'd all help setting those priorities in tickets, Martin
included (he would file tickets for proposals).
For sure SSL is a fundamental topic (it's preventing people from using
the services).

Sounds like an agenda/task item for the meeting is to get more people to
go through tickets, and see if we can resolve and correctly mark priority.

We should also clarify if we want the hours to go as fast as
possible or have some expectation of a time window under which it will
be done.

I would expect between 1 and 2 months of elapsed time to complete
the hours.

Ok, I'd like the contract to be flexible so I suggest we put a deadline
of spending the hours within 2 months. Looks like your previous contract
only had it at 1 month.

Also should time spent on normal management and monitoring be excluded,
system updates, backups etc?

I don't think so, why should them ? If any volunteer is already doing
this it can be announced on this list so the task is taken off Martin's
plate.

I was thinking of tasks Martin currently does under volunteered hours.

Thanks,
Alex

--strk;

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/07/2017 01:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours
of sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
for a total of 5000 EUR.

The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority order
and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings and
suggesting more actions as they are found useful.

Will start with my +1

--strk;

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:

Martin: do you confirm you're up for the job ?

Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo to sell
50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly rate of
100 EUR

_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

5

As discussed in meeting we have enough budget for this.

+1 from me to move forward.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sac [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Alex M
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:19 PM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [SAC] [MOTION] Grant sysadmin contract to Martin Spott

I'd like to put this vote on hold for a day or two until I can get a report from the Treasurer making sure we actually have the amount for this within our current budget. Hopefully I'll have those numbers before the meeting tomorrow.

More responses below...inline.

On 11/07/2017 10:59 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

I'm in favor of the proposal. However we only have 11 tickets marked
higher than "normal", (not all are actually that hard of tasks). So I
think we need to clarify the main topics of interest, SSL and LDAP
seem to be 2 of the bigs things, followed by system configuration
issues like download disk space, retiring osgeo4, containers or
virtualization on osgeo6.

My idea is we'd all help setting those priorities in tickets, Martin
included (he would file tickets for proposals).
For sure SSL is a fundamental topic (it's preventing people from using
the services).

Sounds like an agenda/task item for the meeting is to get more people to go through tickets, and see if we can resolve and correctly mark priority.

We should also clarify if we want the hours to go as fast as possible
or have some expectation of a time window under which it will be
done.

I would expect between 1 and 2 months of elapsed time to complete the
hours.

Ok, I'd like the contract to be flexible so I suggest we put a deadline of spending the hours within 2 months. Looks like your previous contract only had it at 1 month.

Also should time spent on normal management and monitoring be
excluded, system updates, backups etc?

I don't think so, why should them ? If any volunteer is already doing
this it can be announced on this list so the task is taken off
Martin's plate.

I was thinking of tasks Martin currently does under volunteered hours.

Thanks,
Alex

--strk;

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/07/2017 01:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours of
sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
for a total of 5000 EUR.

The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority
order and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings
and suggesting more actions as they are found useful.

Will start with my +1

--strk;

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:

Martin: do you confirm you're up for the job ?

Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo
to sell
50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly
rate of
100 EUR

_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

6

+1

···

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:

As discussed in meeting we have enough budget for this.

+1 from me to move forward.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sac [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Alex M
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:19 PM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [SAC] [MOTION] Grant sysadmin contract to Martin Spott

I’d like to put this vote on hold for a day or two until I can get a report from the Treasurer making sure we actually have the amount for this within our current budget. Hopefully I’ll have those numbers before the meeting tomorrow.

More responses below…inline.

On 11/07/2017 10:59 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

I’m in favor of the proposal. However we only have 11 tickets marked
higher than “normal”, (not all are actually that hard of tasks). So I
think we need to clarify the main topics of interest, SSL and LDAP
seem to be 2 of the bigs things, followed by system configuration
issues like download disk space, retiring osgeo4, containers or
virtualization on osgeo6.

My idea is we’d all help setting those priorities in tickets, Martin
included (he would file tickets for proposals).
For sure SSL is a fundamental topic (it’s preventing people from using
the services).

Sounds like an agenda/task item for the meeting is to get more people to go through tickets, and see if we can resolve and correctly mark priority.

We should also clarify if we want the hours to go as fast as possible
or have some expectation of a time window under which it will be
done.

I would expect between 1 and 2 months of elapsed time to complete the
hours.

Ok, I’d like the contract to be flexible so I suggest we put a deadline of spending the hours within 2 months. Looks like your previous contract only had it at 1 month.

Also should time spent on normal management and monitoring be
excluded, system updates, backups etc?

I don’t think so, why should them ? If any volunteer is already doing
this it can be announced on this list so the task is taken off
Martin’s plate.

I was thinking of tasks Martin currently does under volunteered hours.

Thanks,
Alex

–strk;

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/07/2017 01:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours of
sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
for a total of 5000 EUR.

The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority
order and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings
and suggesting more actions as they are found useful.

Will start with my +1

–strk;

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:

Martin: do you confirm you’re up for the job ?

Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo
to sell
50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly
rate of
100 EUR

Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

–

Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Salzmannstraße 44, 
81739 München, Germany

Vicky Vergara
Operations Research

eMail: vicky@[georepublic.de](http://georepublic.de)
Web: [https://georepublic.info](https://georepublic.info)

Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
CEO: Daniel Kastl
7

As noted in the meeting, we have the budget, so please vote on this
motion by the end of Friday this week.

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/09/2017 01:34 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote:

+1

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:

As discussed in meeting we have enough budget for this.

+1 from me to move forward.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sac [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Alex M
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:19 PM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [SAC] [MOTION] Grant sysadmin contract to Martin Spott

I'd like to put this vote on hold for a day or two until I can get a
report from the Treasurer making sure we actually have the amount for this
within our current budget. Hopefully I'll have those numbers before the
meeting tomorrow.

More responses below...inline.

On 11/07/2017 10:59 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

I'm in favor of the proposal. However we only have 11 tickets marked
higher than "normal", (not all are actually that hard of tasks). So I
think we need to clarify the main topics of interest, SSL and LDAP
seem to be 2 of the bigs things, followed by system configuration
issues like download disk space, retiring osgeo4, containers or
virtualization on osgeo6.

My idea is we'd all help setting those priorities in tickets, Martin
included (he would file tickets for proposals).
For sure SSL is a fundamental topic (it's preventing people from using
the services).

Sounds like an agenda/task item for the meeting is to get more people to
go through tickets, and see if we can resolve and correctly mark priority.

We should also clarify if we want the hours to go as fast as possible
or have some expectation of a time window under which it will be
done.

I would expect between 1 and 2 months of elapsed time to complete the
hours.

Ok, I'd like the contract to be flexible so I suggest we put a deadline of
spending the hours within 2 months. Looks like your previous contract only
had it at 1 month.

Also should time spent on normal management and monitoring be
excluded, system updates, backups etc?

I don't think so, why should them ? If any volunteer is already doing
this it can be announced on this list so the task is taken off
Martin's plate.

I was thinking of tasks Martin currently does under volunteered hours.

Thanks,
Alex

--strk;

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/07/2017 01:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours of
sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
for a total of 5000 EUR.

The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority
order and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings
and suggesting more actions as they are found useful.

Will start with my +1

--strk;

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:

Martin: do you confirm you're up for the job ?

Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo
to sell
50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly
rate of
100 EUR

8

+1 Markus

···

On Nov 9, 2017 10:33 PM, “Regina Obe” <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:

As discussed in meeting we have enough budget for this.

+1 from me to move forward.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sac [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Alex M
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:19 PM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [SAC] [MOTION] Grant sysadmin contract to Martin Spott

I’d like to put this vote on hold for a day or two until I can get a report from the Treasurer making sure we actually have the amount for this within our current budget. Hopefully I’ll have those numbers before the meeting tomorrow.

More responses below…inline.

On 11/07/2017 10:59 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

I’m in favor of the proposal. However we only have 11 tickets marked
higher than “normal”, (not all are actually that hard of tasks). So I
think we need to clarify the main topics of interest, SSL and LDAP
seem to be 2 of the bigs things, followed by system configuration
issues like download disk space, retiring osgeo4, containers or
virtualization on osgeo6.

My idea is we’d all help setting those priorities in tickets, Martin
included (he would file tickets for proposals).
For sure SSL is a fundamental topic (it’s preventing people from using
the services).

Sounds like an agenda/task item for the meeting is to get more people to go through tickets, and see if we can resolve and correctly mark priority.

We should also clarify if we want the hours to go as fast as possible
or have some expectation of a time window under which it will be
done.

I would expect between 1 and 2 months of elapsed time to complete the
hours.

Ok, I’d like the contract to be flexible so I suggest we put a deadline of spending the hours within 2 months. Looks like your previous contract only had it at 1 month.

Also should time spent on normal management and monitoring be
excluded, system updates, backups etc?

I don’t think so, why should them ? If any volunteer is already doing
this it can be announced on this list so the task is taken off
Martin’s plate.

I was thinking of tasks Martin currently does under volunteered hours.

Thanks,
Alex

–strk;

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/07/2017 01:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours of
sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
for a total of 5000 EUR.

The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority
order and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings
and suggesting more actions as they are found useful.

Will start with my +1

–strk;

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:

Martin: do you confirm you’re up for the job ?

Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo
to sell
50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly
rate of
100 EUR

Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

9

Motion is passed +4 votes, no objections.

I'll contact the Board to arrange the contract.

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/09/2017 01:47 PM, Alex M wrote:

As noted in the meeting, we have the budget, so please vote on this
motion by the end of Friday this week.

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/09/2017 01:34 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote:

+1

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:

As discussed in meeting we have enough budget for this.

+1 from me to move forward.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sac [mailto:sac-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Alex M
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:19 PM
To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [SAC] [MOTION] Grant sysadmin contract to Martin Spott

I'd like to put this vote on hold for a day or two until I can get a
report from the Treasurer making sure we actually have the amount for this
within our current budget. Hopefully I'll have those numbers before the
meeting tomorrow.

More responses below...inline.

On 11/07/2017 10:59 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

I'm in favor of the proposal. However we only have 11 tickets marked
higher than "normal", (not all are actually that hard of tasks). So I
think we need to clarify the main topics of interest, SSL and LDAP
seem to be 2 of the bigs things, followed by system configuration
issues like download disk space, retiring osgeo4, containers or
virtualization on osgeo6.

My idea is we'd all help setting those priorities in tickets, Martin
included (he would file tickets for proposals).
For sure SSL is a fundamental topic (it's preventing people from using
the services).

Sounds like an agenda/task item for the meeting is to get more people to
go through tickets, and see if we can resolve and correctly mark priority.

We should also clarify if we want the hours to go as fast as possible
or have some expectation of a time window under which it will be
done.

I would expect between 1 and 2 months of elapsed time to complete the
hours.

Ok, I'd like the contract to be flexible so I suggest we put a deadline of
spending the hours within 2 months. Looks like your previous contract only
had it at 1 month.

Also should time spent on normal management and monitoring be
excluded, system updates, backups etc?

I don't think so, why should them ? If any volunteer is already doing
this it can be announced on this list so the task is taken off
Martin's plate.

I was thinking of tasks Martin currently does under volunteered hours.

Thanks,
Alex

--strk;

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/07/2017 01:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

This is an official motion to grant a contract for 50 hours of
sysadmin work on OSGeo machines to Martin Spott (via his employer)
for a total of 5000 EUR.

The work will consist in going through trac tickets in priority
order and close as many as possible while documenting proceedings
and suggesting more actions as they are found useful.

Will start with my +1

--strk;

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:10:57AM +1300, Sandro Santilli wrote:

Martin: do you confirm you're up for the job ?

Yes, I confirm my employer is interested in contracting with OSGeo
to sell
50 hours of my work time to adress OSGeo SAC issues, at an hourly
rate of
100 EUR

_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

10

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:15:02AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

Motion is passed +4 votes, no objections.
I'll contact the Board to arrange the contract.

Alex, what's the status of this task ?
Is there anything we can do to speed up the process for this and future
contracts ?

--strk;

11

On 12/05/2017 08:13 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:15:02AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

Motion is passed +4 votes, no objections.
I'll contact the Board to arrange the contract.

Alex, what's the status of this task ?
Is there anything we can do to speed up the process for this and future
contracts ?

--strk;

It needs to be signed by both parties. That's it as far as I know.

-Alex

12

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:21:33PM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote:

On 12/05/2017 08:13 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:15:02AM -0800, Alex M wrote:
>> Motion is passed +4 votes, no objections.
>> I'll contact the Board to arrange the contract.
>
> Alex, what's the status of this task ?
> Is there anything we can do to speed up the process for this and future
> contracts ?

It needs to be signed by both parties. That's it as far as I know.

The current OSGeo president told me yesterday that she believes having
sent the signed contract last week. Did you receive it ?

Martin: do you confirm your company signed it already ?

Motion passed on November 15, which is 2 montsh and 10 days ago.
2+ sysadmin contracts could have been _performed_ in this time,
we must improve execution times here...

--strk;

13

On 01/25/2018 02:24 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:21:33PM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote:

On 12/05/2017 08:13 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:15:02AM -0800, Alex M wrote:

Motion is passed +4 votes, no objections.
I'll contact the Board to arrange the contract.

Alex, what's the status of this task ?
Is there anything we can do to speed up the process for this and future
contracts ?

It needs to be signed by both parties. That's it as far as I know.

The current OSGeo president told me yesterday that she believes having
sent the signed contract last week. Did you receive it ?

Martin: do you confirm your company signed it already
Motion passed on November 15, which is 2 montsh and 10 days ago.
2+ sysadmin contracts could have been _performed_ in this time,
we must improve execution times here...

--strk;

Yes it was signed by both parties.
Email from Maria was CC'd to Martin's official work email.

-Alex

14

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 08:54:06AM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote:

On 01/25/2018 02:24 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

> Martin: do you confirm your company signed it already
> Motion passed on November 15, which is 2 montsh and 10 days ago.
> 2+ sysadmin contracts could have been _performed_ in this time,
> we must improve execution times here...

Yes it was signed by both parties.
Email from Maria was CC'd to Martin's official work email.

Martin please let us know when you can start and how we can help
you find priorities.

--strk;

15

Hi all,

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:24:51AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:

Martin: do you confirm your company signed it already ?

Our copany signed the contract late in December and I confirm we recently
recieved a copy signed by OSGeo. Unfortunately this coincidenced with a
peak in preparation workload for a meeting this monday, but I'm confident
I'll be able to start reviewing and working on open items shortly
afterwards.

Until then our administration should - hopefully - have set things up so I
can log working hours.

Cheers,
  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------